Retrospective study of clinical settings, indications and consequences of measurement of direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels in Northern Tasmania, Australia
Research article published in Internal medicine journal (2024)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Routine monitoring of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) levels is not recommended but may be useful in certain clinical situations. There is a knowledge gap regarding the clinical use of DOAC levels in Australian hospitals. AIMS: To evaluate the clinical settings, indications and changes to anticoagulant management associated with DOAC levels in a tertiary hospital in Northern Tasmania, Australia. METHODS: Patients with one or more DOAC levels (dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban) requested between January 2017 and December 2022 were identified. Retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate the clinical settings, indications, adequacy of request information and changes to clinical management associated with the measurement of DOAC levels. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine DOAC measurements (54 rivaroxaban, 66 apixaban and nine dabigatran) were performed in 98 patients between January 2017 and December 2022. Annual requests for DOAC levels increased significantly between 2017 and 2019 and remained stable between 2020 and 2021 but declined in 2022. Overall, the most common indication for a DOAC level was renal impairment, followed by bleeding and recurrent thrombosis. Approximately 25% of requests were for acute bleeding with a reversal/haemostatic agent given in 45% of patients, while 10% were prior to urgent surgery. Measurement of DOAC levels was associated with a change in management in 50% of cases. 10% of requests did not specify anticoagulant history. CONCLUSION: Trends in requests for DOAC levels have changed over time. Clinician education regarding the importance of providing specific anticoagulant history is essential. Future prospective studies investigating the clinical utility of DOAC levels in different clinical settings are needed.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to anticoagulation, leech therapy, and microsurgical flap management. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese retrospektive Aktenauswertung von 129 Plasmaspiegelmessungen direkter oraler Antikoagulanzien (DOAC) bei 98 Patienten eines tertiären Krankenhauses in Tasmanien (2017-2022) ergab, dass die Spiegel — obwohl eine routinemäßige DOAC-Überwachung nicht empfohlen wird — am häufigsten bei Niereninsuffizienz, Blutungen und rezidivierender Thrombose angefordert wurden, dass etwa ein Viertel der Anforderungen mit akuten Blutungen zusammenhing (wobei in 45% ein Reversal-/Hämostatikum verabreicht wurde) und dass die Messung in etwa der Hälfte der Fälle das Management veränderte. Für die Hirudotherapie liefert sie Kontext zu den realen Schwierigkeiten der Überwachung und Reversierung moderner systemischer Antikoagulanzien und bildet damit den Hintergrund für die Diskussion lokal angewandter antithrombotischer Ansätze wie des medizinischen Blutegelansatzes. Als kleine monozentrische retrospektive Studie beschreibt sie Praxismuster statt klinischer Wirksamkeit, fordert selbst prospektive Arbeiten und weist keinen direkten Bezug zur Blutegeltherapie auf.
Zitation
Retrospective study of clinical settings, indications and consequences of measurement of direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels in Northern Tasmania, Australia.
Lim et al. · Internal medicine journal, 2024
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026