Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Emerging therapy options in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Review published in Cardiovascular & Hematological Agents in Medicinal Chemistry (2014)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewArzneimittelentwicklungKlinische StudienChaudhary RK et al. · Cardiovascular & Hematological Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, 2014

Abstract

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life and limb-threatening thrombotic complication of heparin, which is the result of platelet activation by anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. With lepirudin and danaparoid no longer available in the US, treatment options are limited to argatroban, fondaparinux (off-label use) and bivalirudin (for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention). Both argatroban and bivalirudin are parenteral drugs and require close monitoring and hospitalization. Fondaparinux is contraindicated in patients with significant renal impairment and is associated with a small risk of HIT. Anticoagulants approved for thromboprophylaxis and management of thromboembolic conditions such as rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban have fixed oral dose, rapid onset of action and does not require monitoring. These novel agents do not interact with anti-PF4/heparin antibody and offer attractive therapy options for HIT. Their utility in HIT has been supported by a few clinical reports, however, larger studies are needed before they can be utilized in clinical practice. Therapeutic plasma exchange has been utilized with some success in patients with HIT, who need heparin reexposure for cardiac surgery but their safety and efficacy needs further exploration. 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin, which lacks any anticoagulant effect, has been shown to reduce the development of HIT in murine models. Finally, novel targets based on the molecular pathogenesis of HIT are being studied for therapeutic drug development. We hope that the availability of novel therapies in the future will expand the options available for the management of HIT.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAdministration, OralAnimalsAnticoagulantsChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug DesignHeparinHumansThrombocytopenia

Zusammenfassung

Reviews HIT pharmacotherapy in the US post-lepirudin/danaparoid withdrawal era — argatroban, fondaparinux, bivalirudin remain — and discusses prospects for oral direct factor Xa and IIa inhibitors and 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This review surveys emerging treatment options for HIT, noting that lepirudin and danaparoid are no longer available in the US, and discusses argatroban, fondaparinux, bivalirudin, oral anticoagulants, therapeutic plasma exchange, and investigational targets. The abstract names lepirudin only as a prior option no longer available; it does not state that lepirudin is leech-derived, recombinant hirudin, or related to leech saliva, and it does not discuss hirudotherapy. Therefore, any direct relevance to ASH's domain is not supported by the abstract, beyond the historical mention of a drug called lepirudin. The main limitation is that the article is a review of pharmacologic alternatives, not a study of leeches, leech secretome components, or live leech therapy.

Zitation

Emerging therapy options in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Chaudhary RK et al. · Cardiovascular & Hematological Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, 2014

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.