Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (review)

Review published in Haematologica (2000)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidence: Narrative reviewDesarrollo de fármacosEnsayos clínicosFabris F et al. · Haematologica, 2000

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are two types of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT I is characterized by a transitory, slight and asymptomatic reduction in platelet count, occurring in the first 1-2 days of therapy, that resolves spontaneously; in contrast, HIT II, which has an immunologic origin, is characterized by a significant thrombocytopenia generally after the fifth day of therapy that usually resolves in 5-15 days only after therapy withdrawal. HIT II is the most frequent and dangerous side-effect of heparin therapy; in fact, in spite of thrombocytopenia, it can be complicated by venous and arterial thrombosis. Therefore, the recognition of HIT II may be difficult due to the underlying thrombotic symptoms for which heparin is administered. The aim of this article is to review the most recent advances in the field and to give critical guidelines for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of HIT II. STATE OF THE ART: The prevalence of HIT II, as confirmed by laboratory tests, seems to be about 2% in patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UH), while it is much lower in those receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The immunologic etiology of HIT II is largely accepted. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) displaced from endothelial heparan sulphate or directly from the platelets, binds to the heparin molecule to form an immunogenic complex. The anti-heparin/ PF4 IgG immunocomplexes activate platelets and provoke an immunologic endothelial lesion with thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis. The IgG anti-heparin/PF4 immunocomplex activates platelets mainly through binding with the FcgRIIa (CD32) receptor. The onset of thrombocytopenia is independent of the dosage, schedule and route of administration of heparin. Orthopedic and cardiovascular surgery patients receiving post-surgical prophylaxis or treatment for deep venous thrombosis are at higher risk of HIT II. Besides thrombocytopenia, cutaneous allergic manifestations and skin necrosis may be present. Hemorrhagic events are not frequent, while the major clinical complications in 30% of patients are both arterial and venous thromboses which carry a 20% mortality. The diagnosis of HIT II should be formulated on the basis of clinical criteria and in vitro demonstration of heparin-dependent antibodies. Functional tests, such as platelet aggregation and (14)C-serotonin release assay and immunologic tests, such as the search for anti-PF4/heparin complex antibodies by an ELISA method are available. If HITT II is probable, heparin must be immediately suspended and an alternative anticoagulant therapy should be initiated before resolution of thrombocytopenia and the following treatment with a vitamin K antagonist. The general opinion is to administer low molecular weight heparin (in the absence of in vitro cross-reactivity with the antibodies), heparinoids such as Orgaran or direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin. PERSPECTIVES: Further studies are required to elucidate the pathogenesis of HIT II and especially to discover the clinical and immunologic factors that induce the occurrence of thrombotic complications. The best therapeutic strategy remains to be confirmed in larger clinical trials.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview
Indexed MeSH termsHeparinHumansIncidencePlatelet ActivationPractice Guidelines as TopicThrombocytopenia

Resumen

Classical 2000 review of HIT pathogenesis (anti-PF4/heparin IgG immune complexes, FcgRIIa receptor binding), clinical diagnosis, and recommendation of LMWH, danaparoid, or hirudin direct thrombin inhibitor as alternative anticoagulants when HIT II is suspected.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Esta revisión examina las características clínicas, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la trombocitopenia inducida por heparina tipo II (HIT II), un efecto adverso inmunológico del tratamiento con heparina complicado por trombocitopenia y potencial trombosis arterial o venosa con aproximadamente un 20% de mortalidad. El resumen describe la fisiopatología que involucra complejos inmunes anti-heparina/PF4 IgG y enumera inhibidores directos de la trombina como la hirudina entre los anticoagulantes alternativos recomendados cuando se debe retirar la heparina. Para ASH, la relevancia es indirecta: el resumen nombra la hirudina como opción terapéutica pero no aporta información sobre su origen biológico ni ninguna conexión con las sanguijuelas. La revisión aborda la anticoagulación farmacéutica en un contexto clínico, no la hirudoterapia ni los terapéuticos basados en sanguijuelas, y el resumen en sí no establece ningún vínculo con las sanguijuelas ni su uso.

Citación

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Fabris F et al. · Haematologica, 2000

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.