Direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) versus enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized clinical trials
Research article published in Thrombosis research (2015)
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total knee replacement. METHODS: A systematic literature search in Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid and Cochrane library databases was performed to identify RCTs comparing rivaroxaban/apixaban with enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE after total knee replacement. The outcomes including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and major bleeding were pooled using risk ratios (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) as statistic. RESULTS: A total of 6 RCTs with 13,790 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the incidence of DVT was significantly decreased with the use of direct Xa inhibitors (both twice daily [b.i.d] and once daily [q.d.] regimes) comparing with the enoxaparin treatment (P<0.01); however, there was no significant influencing difference between direct Xa inhibitors (b.i.d. regime) and enoxaparin on the incidence of PE (P=0.06), while significantly lower rate was found for q.d. regime of direct Xa inhibitors (P=0.02). With respect to major bleeding, the pooled analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between direct Xa inhibitors (b.i.d. and q.d. regimes) and enoxaparin (30mg and 40mg b.i.d.). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results confirmed that direct Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) were more effective for prevention of VTE after total knee replacement as compared with enoxaparin, without increasing major bleeding risk.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Peer-reviewed leech-derived compound and anticoagulant pharmacology relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este metaanálisis agrupó 6 ensayos controlados aleatorizados (13,790 pacientes) que comparaban los inhibidores orales directos del Factor Xa rivaroxaban y apixaban contra enoxaparina para la prevención de la tromboembolia venosa después del reemplazo total de rodilla; el resumen informa que los inhibidores directos del Xa redujeron significativamente la trombosis venosa profunda frente a enoxaparina (P<0.01) sin un aumento significativo en el sangrado mayor. Su relevancia para la hirudoterapia se encuentra a nivel del panorama de los anticoagulantes y la narrativa del descubrimiento de fármacos: documenta la maduración clínica de los anticoagulantes dirigidos de una sola enzima, el linaje conceptual al que pertenece el secretoma antitrombótico de la sanguijuela medicinal, a pesar de que la hirudin de la sanguijuela actúa sobre la trombina en lugar de sobre el Factor Xa. La advertencia es importante: esta evidencia trata enteramente sobre fármacos sintéticos de molécula pequeña y no hace ninguna afirmación sobre la terapia con sanguijuelas; si bien un metaanálisis de RCT es un nivel alto de evidencia, resume los ensayos existentes y su fuerza está limitada por la calidad y la heterogeneidad de esos 6 estudios.
Citación
Direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) versus enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized clinical trials.
Ma G et al. · Thrombosis research, 2015
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026