Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Heparin-based versus bivalirudin-based anticoagulation in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review

Systematic review published in Frontiers in medicine (2023)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidence: Systematic reviewDesarrollo de fármacosValdes CA et al. · Frontiers in medicine, 2023

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Optimal anticoagulation therapy is essential for the prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications in pediatric patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Recent data have demonstrated bivalirudin has the potential to surpass and replace heparin as the anticoagulant of choice. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review comparing the outcomes of heparin-based versus bivalirudin-based anticoagulation in pediatric patients supported on ECMO to identify the preferred anticoagulant to minimize bleeding events, thrombotic complications, and associated mortality. We referenced the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. These databases were searched from inception through October 2022. Our initial search identified 422 studies. All records were screened by two independent reviewers using the Covidence software for adherence to our inclusion criteria, and seven retrospective cohort studies were identified as appropriate for inclusion. RESULTS: In total, 196 pediatric patients were anticoagulated with heparin and 117 were anticoagulated with bivalirudin while on ECMO. Across the included studies, it was found that for patients treated with bivalirudin, trends were noted toward lower rates of bleeding, transfusion requirements, and thrombosis with no difference in mortality. Overall costs associated with bivalirudin therapy were lower. Time to therapeutic anticoagulation varied between studies though institutions had different anticoagulation targets. CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin may be a safe, cost-effective alternative to heparin in achieving anticoagulation in pediatric ECMO patients. Prospective multicenter studies and randomized control trials with standard anticoagulation targets are needed to accurately compare outcomes associated with heparin versus bivalirudin in pediatric ECMO patients.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeSystematic ReviewJournal Article

Resumen

Heparin-based versus bivalirudin-based anticoagulation in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Esta revisión sistemática comparó la anticoagulación basada en heparina versus la basada en bivalirudina en pacientes pediátricos con ECMO, identificando siete estudios de cohorte retrospectivos (196 pacientes con heparina, 117 con bivalirudina). La revisión encontró tendencias hacia menores tasas de sangrado, menores requerimientos de transfusión, menor trombosis y menores costos globales con bivalirudina, sin diferencias en la mortalidad. El resumen no menciona hirudina, sanguijuelas ni ningún producto derivado de sanguijuelas, por lo que no puede establecerse una conexión defendible con el dominio de hirudoterapia de la ASH ni con el secretoma de la sanguijuela a partir de esta fuente. Los autores concluyeron que la bivalirudina puede ser una alternativa segura y costo-efectiva, pero se necesitan ensayos aleatorizados multicéntricos prospectivos con objetivos de anticoagulación estandarizados.

Citación

Heparin-based versus bivalirudin-based anticoagulation in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review

Valdes CA et al. · Frontiers in medicine, 2023

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.