Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Venous Thromboembolism Therapy with Edoxaban in Daily Care Patients: Results from the DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY.

Research article published in TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis (2025)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungTittl et al. · TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants such as edoxaban are standard of care in current treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, phase III trial data need confirmation in real-world settings. We extracted data from the prospective, noninterventional multiple-indication DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY to evaluate outcome rates during VTE treatment with edoxaban. Patients were included in this analysis, if they had acute VTE and if patient enrolment and edoxaban initiation occurred within 30 days after VTE diagnosis. Patient characteristics, treatment persistence, and clinical outcomes were centrally adjudicated using standard definitions. Until December 31, 2023, 323 acute VTE patients (median age 67 years, 56.7% male) were enrolled and initiated edoxaban within 7.8 ± 4.9 days (mean) for isolated deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (57.6%) or pulmonary embolism (PE) ± DVT (42.4%). Mean duration of follow-up was 3.9 ± 1.9 years with a mean duration of edoxaban exposure of 1.5 ± 1.7 years. During ongoing edoxaban therapy, 3/323 patients (0.9%) experienced recurrent VTE (0.6/100 patient-years); 141/323 (43.7%) patients reported clinically relevant International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) nonmajor bleeding and 16 reported ISTH major bleeding (5.0%; 3.2/100 patient-years). Death was observed in 53 patients (4.1/100 patient-years). At 6 months, 78.2% were still taking edoxaban, 2% were electively switched to dose-reduced secondary prophylaxis with apixaban 2.5 mg twice a day or rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily. The remaining patients had a scheduled end of VTE treatment (11.4%) or were switched to nonedoxaban therapeutic anticoagulation (6.2%). Our results indicate effectiveness of edoxaban in acute VTE treatment with excellent persistence in the treatment and low rates of unplanned discontinuation. Bleeding was frequently observed, but rates of major bleeding were low and comparable to phase III data.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Zusammenfassung

Direct oral anticoagulants such as edoxaban are standard of care in current treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, phase III trial data need confirmation in real-world settings.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This prospective, noninterventional registry analysis evaluated edoxaban for acute venous thromboembolism treatment in 323 patients from the DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY, reporting a recurrent VTE rate of 0.6 per 100 patient-years, a major bleeding rate of 3.2 per 100 patient-years, and high treatment persistence at 6 months (78.2%). The study has no direct relevance to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome, as edoxaban is a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor unrelated to hirudin or any leech-derived compound. Caveat: This is a real-world observational registry analysis of a single oral anticoagulant; there is no involvement of leeches, hirudin, bivalirudin, or leech-derived substances, and no meaningful connection to hirudotherapy practice.

Zitation

Venous Thromboembolism Therapy with Edoxaban in Daily Care Patients: Results from the DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY.

Tittl et al. · TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.