Anticoagulant for treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism patients with renal dysfunction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Systematic review published in Frontiers in medicine (2022)
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety for particular regimen and dosage in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients with renal insufficiency. METHODS: English language searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (inception to May 2021). RCTs evaluating anticoagulants for VTE treatment at acute phase, extension phase, and VTE prophylaxis in patients with renal insufficiency and reporting efficacy (death, recurrence, or occurrence of VTE) and safety (bleeding) outcomes were selected. The methodological quality of each study included was assessed at the outcome level using the risk-of-bias assessment tool developed by the Cochrane Bias Methods Group. RESULTS: Twenty-one trials that involved 76,574 participants and 8,972 (11.7%) patients with renal insufficiency were enrolled, including 10 trials on VTE treatment in acute phase (3-12 months), four trials on VTE treatment in extension phase (6-36 months), and seven trials for VTE prophylaxis. For acute VTE treatment, compared with dabigatran etexilate, apixaban (RR 5.90, 95%CI 1.00-34.60) and rivaroxaban (RR 6.18, 95%CI 1.17-32.75) were significantly associated with increased risk of death or recurrence. For extension treatment of VTE, aspirin had the highest probability of the most effective and safest treatment, followed by apixaban. For VTE prophylaxis, compared with enoxaparin, desirudin was associated with lower risk of VTE occurrence (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.91), but had higher risk of bleeding than dabigatran etexilate. CONCLUSION: The network meta-analysis informs the optimal choice of anticoagulants and their particular dosage for treatment and prophylaxis of VTE patients comorbid renal insufficiency. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021254086.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety for particular regimen and dosage in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients with renal insufficiency.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Dieser systematische Review und diese Netzwerk-Metaanalyse verglichen Antikoagulans-Schemata zur VTE-Behandlung und -Prophylaxe bei Patienten mit Niereninsuffizienz und analysierten 21 Studien mit 76 574 Teilnehmern. Unter den Ergebnissen war Desirudin im Vergleich zu Enoxaparin zur Prophylaxe mit einem geringeren Risiko für das Auftreten einer VTE assoziiert (relatives Risiko 0,56; 95-%-KI 0,34–0,91), wies jedoch ein höheres Blutungsrisiko als Dabigatranetexilat auf. Für die Domäne von ASH ist die Relevanz indirekt: Das Abstract benennt Desirudin lediglich als eines von mehreren Antikoagulans-Vergleichspräparaten, ohne dessen biochemischen Ursprung oder Beziehung zu Hirudin zu charakterisieren. Die Analyse fokussiert auf pharmakologische Antikoagulanzien und die Optimierung der renalen Dosierung und nicht auf Hirudotherapie oder das Blutegelsekretom.
Zitation
Anticoagulant for treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism patients with renal dysfunction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Fan G et al. · Frontiers in medicine, 2022
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026