Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Oral Anticoagulation.

Review published in Deutsches Arzteblatt international (2018)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungAltiok et al. · Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Much new evidence on oral anticoagulation has come to light in recent years. Non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anti- coagulants (NOAC) have been developed and have been introduced into clinical practice. In this review, we present the current state of the evidence on anticoagulation for various indications with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and with NOAC. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective search in PubMed (search terms: anticoagulation, atrial fibrillation, prosthetic valve, thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) and on specialty society recommendations and relevant guidelines from the years 2000-2018. RESULTS: The main indications for oral anticoagulation are atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and status post heart valve replacement. In patients with atrial fibrillation and without valvular heart disease, anticoagulation is recommended for men with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 and for women with a score ≥ 2. NOAC for this indication are associated with a marginally lower rate of stroke than VKA (3.5% vs. 3.8%, number needed to treat [NNT] = 333) as well as a lower rate of major hemorrhage (5.1% vs. 6.2%, NNT = 91). NOAC are contraindicated for patients with mechanical heart valves. Anticoagulation with VKA can be predictably antagonized. Among the various types of NOAC, the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran can be safely antagonized with an antidote; no specific antidote is yet available for apixaban, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban. CONCLUSION: The evidence base for anticoagulation over a time frame of several years is inadequate at present, and direct comparative data for the different types of NOAC are not yet available.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansRisk AssessmentVenous ThromboembolismVitamin K

Zusammenfassung

Much new evidence on oral anticoagulation has come to light in recent years. Non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anti- coagulants (NOAC) have been developed and have been introduced into clinical practice.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This review evaluated the current state of evidence for oral anticoagulation, specifically comparing vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs) across various cardiovascular indications. For the American Society of Hirudotherapy, this article provides important background on systemic anticoagulant therapies, which conceptually parallel the potent localized anticoagulant effects of leech salivary components like hirudin. Reviewing the bleeding risks and therapeutic mechanisms of standard oral anticoagulants helps define the clinical landscape in which leech-derived therapies might be understood or contrasted. However, the abstract focuses exclusively on conventional pharmacology and does not mention leeches, hirudotherapy, or the leech secretome, representing only indirect thematic relevance.

Zitation

Oral Anticoagulation.

Altiok et al. · Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.