Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: principal results of a meta-analysis based on individual patients' data

Research article published in Lancet (London, England) (2002)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Meta-analysisDesarrollo de fármacosDirect et al. · Lancet (London, England), 2002

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To obtain more reliable and precise estimates of the effect of direct thrombin inhibitors in the management of acute coronary syndromes, including patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, we undertook a meta-analysis based on individual patients' data from randomised trials comparing a direct thrombin inhibitor (hirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban, efegatran, or inogatran) with heparin. METHODS: We included trials that involved at least 200 patients. The primary efficacy outcome was death or myocardial infarction, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Data from individual trials were combined by use of a modified Mantel-Haenszel method. FINDINGS: In 11 randomised trials, 35,970 patients were assigned up to 7 days' treatment with a direct thrombin inhibitor or heparin and followed up for at least 30 days. Compared with heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of death or myocardial infarction at the end of treatment (4.3% vs 5.1%; odds ratio 0.85 [95% CI 0.77-0.94]; p=0.001) and at 30 days (7.4% vs 8.2%; 0.91 [0.84-0.99]; p=0.02). This was due primarily to a reduction in myocardial infarctions (2.8% vs 3.5%; 0.80 [0.71-0.90]; p<0.001) with no apparent effect on deaths (1.9% vs 2.0%; 0.97 [0.83-1.13]; p=0.69). Subgroup analyses suggested a benefit of direct thrombin inhibitors on death or myocardial infarction in trials of both acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions. A reduction in death or myocardial infarction was seen with hirudin and bivalirudin but not with univalent agents. Compared with heparin, there was an increased risk of major bleeding with hirudin, but a reduction with bivalirudin. There was no excess in intracranial haemorrhage with direct thrombin inhibitors. INTERPRETATION: Direct thrombin inhibitors are superior to heparin for the prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes. This information should prompt further clinical development of direct thrombin inhibitors for the management of arterial thrombosis.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeComparative StudyJournal ArticleMeta-AnalysisResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAngina, UnstableAntithrombinsArginineGlycineHeparinHirudin TherapyHirudinsHumansMyocardial InfarctionOligopeptidesPeptide FragmentsPipecolic Acids

Resumen

Peer-reviewed research on anticoagulant and antithrombotic drug development relevant to thrombin and factor inhibition. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Este metaanálisis agrupó datos de pacientes individuales de 11 ensayos aleatorizados (35.970 pacientes) que comparaban inhibidores directos de la trombina (hirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban, efegatran o inogatran) con heparina en síndromes coronarios agudos e intervencionismo coronario percutáneo. El resumen informa que los inhibidores directos de la trombina redujeron el riesgo de muerte o infarto agudo de miocardio al final del tratamiento (4,3% vs 5,1%; OR 0,85, IC del 95% 0,77-0,94) y a los 30 días (OR 0,91, IC del 95% 0,84-0,99), impulsados principalmente por menos infartos agudos de miocardio sin efecto aparente sobre la muerte, con un beneficio observado para hirudin y bivalirudin pero no para los agentes univalentes y perfiles de sangrado distintos. Este es el elemento más directamente relevante para la hirudoterapia: hirudin es el anticoagulante distintivo de la sanguijuela medicinal, y este gran metaanálisis agrupado muestra que los inhibidores directos de la trombina derivados de la sanguijuela e inspirados en ella presentaron una actividad anticoagulante clínica mensurable en un escenario cardiovascular importante, anclando la historia del descubrimiento de fármacos del secretoma de la sanguijuela en datos de resultados humanos. Nota honesta: los ensayos evaluaron fármacos anticoagulantes sistémicos purificados o recombinantes en cardiología, no la aplicación de sanguijuelas ni la hirudoterapia tópica, y el riesgo de sangrado varió según el agente, por lo que estos resultados se refieren a la farmacología del hirudin en lugar del tratamiento clínico con sanguijuelas en sí.

Citación

Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: principal results of a meta-analysis based on individual patients' data.

Direct et al. · Lancet (London, England), 2002

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.