Delayed-type hypersensitivity and cross-reactivity to heparins and danaparoid: a prospective study
Research article published in Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] (2001)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions in patients receiving heparin may occur with both unfractionated (UFHs) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs). Skin testing is a clue to detect tolerated heparin or heparinoid preparations for further treatment. OBJECTIVE: To study in vivo cross-reactivity between LMWHs, UFHs, and danaparoid by skin testing in patients with suspected DTH to heparin. METHODS: Patients who fulfilled the criteria for the diagnosis of suspected heparin allergy were involved in a prospective study after informed consent. Patients presented with or had a history of typical erythematous plaques at the heparin injection sites. Skin testing was performed by subcutaneous injections of heparin (300-500 IU anti-Xa activity) and danaparoid (375 IU, eight patients). Desirudin (27,000 IU) was tested in three patients. We read skin reactions after 24, 48, and 96 hours and after 7 days. RESULTS: Fourteen female and 4 male patients were included in our series. Erythematous plaques had been reported or developed after 14-35 days in patients during first-time heparin treatment and after 2-10 days in reexposed patients. Positive skin test results were seen in 15 of 18 (83.3%) patients. Of these, 11 (73.3%) showed cross-reactivity between heparins and/or danaparoid. Six patients reacted to LMWHs only, nine patients to both LMWHs and UFHs. Danaparoid was tolerated in six of eight patients; desirudin was tolerated in all three patients tested. CONCLUSIONS: DTH to heparins is characterized by considerable cross-reactivity between LMWHs, UFHs, and danaparoid. UFHs may be tolerated even if LMWHs are not. Subcutaneous testing of a panel of heparins, danaparoid, and desirudin (hirudin) is recommended to determine acceptable treatment options for patients allergic to specific heparins.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Peer-reviewed research on anticoagulant and antithrombotic drug development relevant to leech-derived and synthetic compounds. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este estudio prospectivo de pruebas cutáneas de 18 pacientes con sospecha de hipersensibilidad de tipo retardado a heparin encontró reacciones positivas en 15 (83.3%) con una amplia reactividad cruzada entre heparin de bajo peso molecular, heparin no fraccionada y danaparoide, mientras que el danaparoide fue tolerado en 6 de 8 pacientes y desirudin (hirudin recombinante) fue tolerado en los 3 pacientes evaluados, lo que llevó a los autores a recomendar la evaluación de un panel que incluyera desirudin para encontrar anticoagulantes aceptables para pacientes alérgicos a heparin. Esto es directamente pertinente a la narrativa científica de la hirudoterapia porque desirudin es una forma recombinante de hirudin, el anticoagulante prototípico del secretoma de la sanguijuela medicinal, y el informe ilustra un nicho clínico donde un agente basado en hirudin tuvo éxito como alternativa cuando no se toleró la heparin. Las advertencias son que se trata de una pequeña serie de casos prospectiva de 18 pacientes con solo 3 exposiciones a desirudin, evaluando el fármaco recombinante en lugar de la terapia con sanguijuela completa, por lo que respalda el valor de la farmacología de hirudin en pacientes alérgicos a heparin seleccionados, pero no establece por sí mismo la eficacia o seguridad de la terapia con sanguijuelas.
Citación
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026