Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Dosing Reliability of Direct Thrombin Inhibitors in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis published in ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) (2025)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Meta-analysisArzneimittelentwicklungWieruszewski PM et al. · ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992), 2025

Abstract

Empirical evidence suggests direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) produce more favorable hemostatic outcomes than heparin in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), yet the exact mechanisms responsible are unknown. We systematically searched databases and registers for studies comparing DTIs to heparin in humans receiving ECMO. A total of 28 studies were identified, most of which (n = 25) used bivalirudin, while the rest (n = 3) used argatroban. In random-effects meta-analysis, DTIs achieved the therapeutic anticoagulation range faster (mean difference = -6.96 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -11.98 to -1.95, p = 0.006) and maintained the therapeutic range for a greater proportion of time (mean difference = 18.6%, 95% CI = 8.78-28.42, p < 0.001) than heparin. Subgroup analysis revealed these effects were similarly significant in adult patients and when bivalirudin was the DTI; however, they were not significant in pediatric patients or when argatroban was the DTI. Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness of the primary findings in only low-risk of bias studies and in only studies published as full papers. In summary, DTIs-specifically bivalirudin-were associated with faster time to therapeutic anticoagulation and maintained the goal range for a greater percentage of time than heparin during ECMO support.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
Indexed MeSH termsExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHumansAntithrombinsHirudinsPipecolic AcidsPeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsHeparinArginineSulfonamidesAnticoagulants

Zusammenfassung

Empirical evidence suggests direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) produce more favorable hemostatic outcomes than heparin in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), yet the exact mechanisms responsible are unknown.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This systematic review and meta-analysis identified 28 studies comparing direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) with heparin for anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, finding that DTIs—predominantly bivalirudin (25 studies), with argatroban in 3—achieved therapeutic anticoagulation faster and maintained it for a greater proportion of time than heparin. Subgroup analyses showed significance in adults and with bivalirudin but not in pediatric patients or with argatroban. The abstract does not mention hirudin, leeches, or any leech-derived agents, so a defensible connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome cannot be made from the article itself; any such link would be external knowledge. Relevance to ASH is therefore not established by this abstract.

Zitation

Dosing Reliability of Direct Thrombin Inhibitors in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wieruszewski PM et al. · ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992), 2025

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.