Alternatives to unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation in cardiopulmonary bypass.
Review published in Perfusion (2001)
Abstract
Despite the progress made in the development of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) equipment, systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and post-bypass neutralization with protamine are still used in most perfusion procedures. However, there are a number of situations where unfractionated heparin, protamine or both cannot be used for various reasons. Intolerance of protamine can be addressed with extracorporeal heparin removal devices, perfusion with (no) low systemic heparinization and, to some degree, by perfusion with alternative anticoagulants. Various alternative anticoagulation regimens have been used in cases of intolerance to unfractionated heparin, including extreme hemodilution, low molecular weight heparins, danaparoid, ancrod, r-hirudin, abciximab, tirofiban, argatroban and others. In the presence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombosis, the use of r-hirudin appears to be an acceptable solution which has been well studied. The main issue with r-hirudin is the difficulty in monitoring its activity during CPB, despite the fact that ecarin coagulation time assessment is now available. A more recent approach is based on selective blockage of platelet aggregation by means of monoclonal antibodies directed to GPIIb/IIIa receptors (abciximab) or the use of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban). An 80% blockage of the GPIIb/IIIa receptors and suppression of platelet aggregation to less than 20% allows the giving of unfractionated heparin and running CPB in a standard fashion despite HIT and thrombosis. Likewise, at the end of the procedure, unfractionated heparin is neutralized with protamine as usual and donor platelets are transfused if necessary. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors are frequently used in interventional cardiology and, therefore, are available in most hospitals.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Despite the progress made in the development of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) equipment, systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and post-bypass neutralization with protamine are still used in most perfusion procedures. However, there are a number of situations where unfractionated...
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Dieser Übersichtsartikel bewertet alternative Antikoagulationsstrategien für den kardiopulmonalen Bypass bei Patienten, die kein unfraktioniertes Heparin oder keine Protamin-Neutralisation erhalten können. Das Abstract identifiziert r-Hirudin als eine gut untersuchte und akzeptable Antikoagulans-Option in Fällen, die durch Heparin-induzierte Thrombozytopenie und Thrombose kompliziert sind, und weist darauf hin, dass die Schwierigkeit der Überwachung seiner Aktivität während des Bypass eine wesentliche Einschränkung darstellt. Für den ASH-Bereich ist die Einbeziehung von r-Hirudin unter den klinisch eingesetzten Antikoagulanzien bemerkenswert. Jedoch behandelt der Artikel ausschließlich systemische pharmakologische Wirkstoffe und enthält keine Diskussion von Hirudotherapie, lebenden Blutegeln oder dem breiteren Blutegel-Sekretom; das Abstract gibt den biologischen Ursprung von r-Hirudin nicht an.
Zitation
Alternatives to unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation in cardiopulmonary bypass.
von Segesser et al. · Perfusion, 2001
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026