Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia): a randomized controlled trial
Randomized controlled trial published in Critical Care (2014)
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients often require renal replacement therapy accompanied by thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia during heparin anticoagulation may be due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with need for alternative anticoagulation. Therefore, we compared argatroban and lepirudin in critically ill surgical patients. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval and written informed consent, critically ill surgical patients more than or equal to 18 years with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, were randomly assigned to receive double-blind argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation targeting an activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) of 1.5 to 2 times baseline. In patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy we compared the life-time of hemodialysis filters. We evaluated in all patients the incidence of bleeding and thrombembolic events. RESULTS: We identified 66 patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, including 28 requiring renal replacement therapy. Mean filter lifetimes did not differ between groups (argatroban 32 ± 25 hours (n = 12) versus lepirudin 27 ± 21 hours (n = 16), mean difference 5 hours, 95% CI -13 to 23, P = 0.227). Among all 66 patients, relevant bleeding occurred in four argatroban- versus eleven lepirudin-patients (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 14.0, P = 0.040). In the argatroban-group, three thromboembolic events occurred compared to two in the lepirudin group (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.1 to 4.4, P = 0.639). The incidence of confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was 23% (n = 15) in our study population. CONCLUSIONS: This first randomized controlled double-blind trial comparing two direct thrombin inhibitors showed comparable effectiveness for renal replacement therapy, but suggests fewer bleeds in surgical patients with argatroban anticoagulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT00798525. Registered 25 November 2008.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
First randomized double-blind head-to-head trial of two direct thrombin inhibitors in 66 critically ill surgical patients with suspected HIT; argatroban and lepirudin showed comparable hemodialysis-filter lifetimes but argatroban had significantly fewer bleeding events (4 vs 11, OR 3.9).
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese randomisierte kontrollierte doppelblinde Studie verglich Argatroban und Lepirudin bei 66 kritisch kranken chirurgischen Patienten mit Verdacht auf heparininduzierte Thrombozytopenie, mit Ziel-aPTT des 1,5- bis 2-fachen Ausgangswerts. Bei 28 Patienten, die eine kontinuierliche Nierenersatztherapie benötigten, waren die Hämodialysefilter-Standzeiten zwischen den Gruppen vergleichbar, relevante Blutungskomplikationen traten jedoch signifikant häufiger unter Lepirudin auf (11 Ereignisse) als unter Argatroban (4 Ereignisse; OR 3,9, p = 0,040). Das Abstract beschreibt nicht die Beziehung von Lepirudin zu Hirudin und erwähnt keine Blutegel, sodass eine Verbindung zur Hirudotherapie nicht durch den Abstract-Text gestützt wird. Nur bei 23 % lag eine bestätigte HIT vor, und die Stichprobe ist relativ klein, was die Generalisierbarkeit einschränken kann.
Zitation
Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia): a randomized controlled trial.
Treschan TA et al. · Critical Care, 2014
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026