Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

The Direct Thrombin Inhibitors Dabigatran and Lepirudin Inhibit GPIbalpha-Mediated Platelet Aggregation

Basic science study published in Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2019)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportArzneimittelentwicklungGenomik & ProteomikTrabold K et al. · Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2019

Abstract

The direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) dabigatran is a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In addition to its anti-thrombotic efficacy, dabigatran has been suggested to exert some pro-thrombotic effect due to fostering the ligation of thrombin to its high affinity platelet receptor glycoprotein (GP) Ibα in patients with atrial fibrillation. On the other hand, we provided evidence that a member of another class of DTIs, lepirudin, stimulates the inhibitory cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)/soluble guanylate cyclase pathway in human platelets. Here, we investigated the effect of lepirudin and dabigatran spiked to platelets from healthy volunteers on GPIbα-mediated platelet aggregation and agglutination. Ristocetin/von Willebrand factor (vWF)-induced aggregation of platelets in the presence or absence of plasma was significantly inhibited by lepirudin, dabigatran and D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone (PPACK). However, ristocetin/vWF-mediated platelet agglutination and binding of vWF to platelets were not affected by the DTIs. The anti-aggregatory effect was confirmed by using the GPIbα-specific agonist echicetin beads for human and murine platelets. DTIs diminished echicetin beads-induced Syk Y352 phosphorylation (used here as readout for an early signal occurring during echicetin-induced platelet aggregation), but did not inhibit adenosine diphosphate- or thromboxane A2-induced platelet aggregation. Thrombin was not generated in response to ristocetin/vWF or echicetin beads and therefore did not explain the inhibitory effect of the DTIs. Therapeutic concentration of lepirudin and dabigatran did not affect significantly platelet vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein S239 phosphorylation or cGMP and cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels. These data suggest that the DTIs, lepirudin and dabigatran, impair platelet activation measured during platelet aggregation induced by ristocetin/vWF or echicetin beads.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAnimalsAntithrombinsAtrial FibrillationBlood PlateletsCells, CulturedDabigatranFemaleHirudinsHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BL

Zusammenfassung

Direct thrombin inhibitors lepirudin and dabigatran inhibit ristocetin/vWF-induced platelet aggregation through GPIbalpha, with implications for an under-appreciated antiplatelet mechanism beyond thrombin inhibition.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This study investigated the effects of two direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs)—lepirudin and dabigatran—on GPIbα-mediated platelet aggregation and agglutination, using platelets from healthy volunteers spiked with each agent. Both DTIs significantly inhibited ristocetin/vWF-induced platelet aggregation and echicetin bead-induced aggregation in human and murine platelets, without affecting platelet agglutination or vWF binding directly, and diminished echicetin-induced Syk phosphorylation. The study provides mechanistic data on how DTIs may impair platelet activation during aggregation. However, these experiments used spiked platelet samples from healthy donors, not clinical or in vivo data, and the mechanistic pathway (cGMP) could not fully explain the observed effects. The abstract provides no information connecting lepirudin to leeches or hirudotherapy.

Zitation

The Direct Thrombin Inhibitors Dabigatran and Lepirudin Inhibit GPIbalpha-Mediated Platelet Aggregation.

Trabold K et al. · Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2019

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.