Recombinant hirudin for cardiopulmonary bypass anticoagulation: a randomized, prospective, and heparin-controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND: Lepirudin, a recombinant hirudin, is a direct acting thrombin inhibitor that has been used as a heparin alternative in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia requiring on-pump cardiac surgery. To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical utility of lepirudin as a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) anticoagulant, we compared lepirudin with heparin in a routine CPB setting. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomly assigned to receive lepirudin (0.25 mg/kg b. w. bolus and 0.2 mg/kg b. w. added to the CPB priming) or heparin (400 U/kg b. w. bolus) with protamine reversal. Lepirudin and heparin anticoagulation during CPB was monitored using the ecarin clotting time or ACT, respectively and additional lepirudin (5 mg) or heparin (5000 U) boluses were administered. RESULTS: The CPB circuit was performed in both groups without thromboembolic complications. Median blood loss during the first 36 hours was statistically higher ( P = 0.007) in the lepirudin group (1.226 +/- 316 ml) compared to the heparin group (869 +/- 189 ml). One patient of the lepirudin group developed pulmonary embolism 24 hours after surgery. This patient was tested homozygous for the FV-Leiden mutation. CONCLUSION: Lepirudin provides effective CPB anticoagulation but induces a higher postoperative blood loss than heparin. Lepirudin should be restricted to patients undergoing CPB who cannot be exposed to heparin.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Twenty-patient randomized pilot comparing lepirudin (0.25 mg/kg bolus + 0.2 mg/kg in priming) versus heparin (400 U/kg) for CPB anticoagulation; lepirudin provided effective anticoagulation monitored by ecarin clotting time but caused significantly higher postoperative blood loss (1226 vs 869 mL).

Leech-derived molecules this paper discusses, each with a full profile in the ASH compound registry:

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

More peer-reviewed studies in Klinische Studien.

• Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
• Investigation of the therapeutic effects of medicinal leech treatment on lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion injury — Ünal K et al. (2026)
• Efficacy of Medicinal Leech Therapy in Diverse Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Study from Azerbaijan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
• Hirudotherapy Efficacy and Complications in the Management of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review — Foppiani J et al. (2024)
• Hirudotherapy in Wound Healing — Nair H et al. (2022)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →