Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Intravenous Direct Thrombin Inhibitors for Acute Venous Thromboembolism or Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia with Thrombosis in Children: A Systematic Review

Systematic review published in Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis (2024)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Systematic reviewArzneimittelentwicklungKlinische StudienKiskaddon AL et al. · Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 2024

Abstract

Intravenous direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are used for thromboembolic disorders. This systematic review aims to characterize intravenous DTI agents, dosing, monitoring strategies (or use), bleeding, and mortality, in pediatric patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT). MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane's CENTRAL were searched from inception through July 2023. Case series, retrospective studies, and prospective studies providing per-patient or summary data for patients < 18 years of age with VTE or HITT treated with an intravenous DTI were included. Selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Sixteen studies (7 case reports, 1 case series, 5 retrospective studies, 3 prospective studies) with 85 patients were included. Target conditions included acute VTE in 54 (64%) and HITT in 31 (36%) patients. Bivalirudin, argatroban, and lepirudin were used in 52 (61%), 27 (32%), and 6 (7%) patients, respectively. Fifty-two (61%) patients received a bolus dose, and weighted mean infusion rates for bivalirudin, argatroban, and lepirudin were 0.2 mg/kg/hr, 1.2 mcg/kg/min, and 0.15 mg/kg/hr, respectively. The activated partial thromboplastin time was utilized for monitoring in 82 (96%) patients. Complete or partial thrombus resolution was reported in 53 (62%) patients, mortality in 6 (7%) patients, and bleeding complications in 14 (16%) patients. In this systematic review involving 85 pediatric patients treated with an intravenous DTI for acute VTE or HITT, bivalirudin was the most commonly utilized agent, with a rate of resolution over 60% despite a high acuity in the population studied. Prospective collaborative studies are warranted to establish optimal dosing and further characterize VTE and bleeding outcomes.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleSystematic Review
Indexed MeSH termsHumansThrombocytopeniaHeparinVenous ThromboembolismChildAntithrombinsThrombosisAcute DiseaseAdolescentFemaleMale

Zusammenfassung

Systematic review of 16 studies and 85 pediatric patients receiving bivalirudin (61%), argatroban (32%) or lepirudin (7%) for acute VTE or HIT with thrombosis; 62% achieved thrombus resolution with 16% bleeding complication rate.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This systematic review characterized intravenous direct thrombin inhibitor use in 85 pediatric patients with acute venous thromboembolism or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis, drawing on case reports, case series, retrospective, and prospective studies. Lepirudin was used in 6 patients (7%), while bivalirudin (61%) and argatroban (32%) were more common; complete or partial thrombus resolution occurred in 62% overall. The abstract does not describe lepirudin's relationship to hirudin or mention leeches. For ASH, the connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome is not supported by the abstract, which discusses these agents purely as direct thrombin inhibitors. The evidence base is observational, and prospective collaborative studies are warranted.

Zitation

Intravenous Direct Thrombin Inhibitors for Acute Venous Thromboembolism or Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia with Thrombosis in Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Kiskaddon AL et al. · Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 2024

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.