Poly-paraphyly of Hirudinidae: many lineages of medicinal leeches

BACKGROUND: Medicinal leeches became infamous for their utility in bloodletting popularized in the 19th century, and have seen a recent resurgence in post-operative treatments for flap and replantation surgeries, and in terms of characterization of salivary anticoagulants. Notorious throughout the world, the quintessential leech family Hirudinidae has been taken for granted to be monophyletic, as has the non-bloodfeeding family Haemopidae. RESULTS: This study is the first to evaluate molecular evidence from hirudinid and haemopid leeches in a manner that encompasses the global scope of their taxonomic distributions. We evaluated the presumed monophyly of the Hirudinidae and assessed previous well-accepted classification schemes. The Hirudinidae were found not to be monophyletic, falling instead into two distinct and unrelated clades. Members of the non-bloodfeeding family Haemopidae were scattered throughout the tree and among traditional hirudinid genera. A combination of nuclear 18S rDNA and 28S rDNA with mitochondrial 12S rDNA and cytochrome c oxidase I were analyzed with Parsimony and with Bayesian methods. CONCLUSION: The family Hirudinidae must be refined to include only the clade containing Hirudo medicinalis (European medicinal leech) and related leeches irrespective of bloodfeeding behavior. A second clade containing Macrobdella decora (North American medicinal leech) and its relatives may yet be recognized in Semiscolecidae in order to avoid paraphyly. The African distribution of species from each of the divergent hirudinid clades suggests that a deep divergence took place in the history of the medicinal leeches hundreds of millions of years ago.

Abstract aus PubMed (NCBI) für den zitierten Eintrag, in der Originalsprache wiedergegeben. Maßgeblich ist die Fassung der Originalpublikation.

Das Abstract wird nicht übersetzt, damit die eigene Wortwahl der Autoren erhalten bleibt.

Combined nuclear (18S, 28S) and mitochondrial (12S, COI) phylogenetic analysis of hirudinid and haemopid leeches shows Hirudinidae are not monophyletic but split into two clades, suggesting a deep divergence within medicinal leeches hundreds of millions of years ago.

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Weitere begutachtete Studien in der Kategorie „Genomik & Proteomik“.

• Leech Salivary Proteome and Transcriptome: 434 Deduced Protein Sequences — Liu Z, Tong X, Su Y, et al. (2019)
• Medicinal Leech Draft Genome — Anticoagulant Gene Survey — Kvist S, Manzano-Marín A, de Carle D, Trontelj P, Siddall ME (2020)
• Blutegeltherapie (Hirudo medicinalis) mildert die durch testikuläre Ischämie/Reperfusion induzierten Hodenschäden in einem Tiermodell — Davoodi F et al. (2021)
• Neues antikoagulatorisches Protein aus dem medizinischen Blutegel — Manuvera V et al. (2024)
• AIF-1 und RNASET2 spielen komplementäre Rollen in der angeborenen Immunantwort des medizinischen Blutegels — Baranzini N et al. (2019)
• Antimikrobielle Peptide des medizinischen Blutegels ohne Toxizität stellen eine vielversprechende alternative Strategie zur Bekämpfung antibiotikaresistenter Erreger dar — Grafskaia E et al. (2019)
• Structural insights into thrombolytic activity of destabilase from medicinal leech — Marin E et al. (2023)
• Das Genom des medizinischen Blutegels (Whitmania pigra) und eine vergleichende Genomstudie zur Erforschung bioaktiver Inhaltsstoffe — Tong L et al. (2022)
• Das ZNS des medizinischen Blutegels als Modell für Exosomen-Studien zum Wechselspiel zwischen Mikroglia und Neuronen — Raffo-Romero A et al. (2018)
• Transcriptomic profiling and the first spatial expression analysis of candidate genes in the salivary gland of the East Asian medicinal leech, Hirudo nipponia — Kim J et al. (2024)

Alle von der ASH analysierten Studien →