Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Rivaroxaban and apixaban are less effective than enoxaparin for the prevention of catheter-induced clotting invitro

Research article published in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH (2022)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportKlinische StudienGuan Z et al. · Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2022

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters are prone to clotting, particularly in patients with cancer. Although low-molecular-weight heparin and direct oral anticoagulants, such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, have been evaluated for the prevention of catheter thrombosis, their efficacy remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: Compare apixaban and rivaroxaban with enoxaparin for the prevention of catheter-induced clotting in vitro. METHODS: To address this uncertainty, we used a well-established microplate-based assay to compare the effects of enoxaparin, apixaban, and rivaroxaban on catheter-induced thrombosis and thrombin generation in human plasma. RESULTS: Consistent with our previous findings, catheter segments shortened the clotting time and promoted thrombin generation. When compared at concentrations with similar anti-factor Xa activity as enoxaparin, apixaban and rivaroxaban were >20-fold less potent than enoxaparin for the prevention of catheter-induced clotting and thrombin generation. CONCLUSION: The prevention of catheter thrombosis in patients with cancer is challenging. Clinical trials are needed to compare the efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin with that of direct oral anticoagulants both for the prevention and treatment of catheter thrombosis.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsHumansEnoxaparinRivaroxabanAnticoagulantsThrombinPyridonesHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightThrombosisCathetersNeoplasmsFactor Xa InhibitorsPyrazoles

Zusammenfassung

Central venous catheters are prone to clotting, particularly in patients with cancer.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This in vitro study compared apixaban, rivaroxaban, and enoxaparin for prevention of catheter-induced clotting and thrombin generation in human plasma using a microplate-based assay, finding that the direct oral anticoagulants were >20-fold less potent than enoxaparin at equivalent anti-factor Xa activity. The study highlights ongoing challenges in preventing catheter thrombosis, particularly in cancer patients. For ASH's domain, the relevance is only indirect—the study examines synthetic oral anticoagulants and low-molecular-weight heparin with no involvement of leeches, hirudin, or any leech-secretome component. The caveat is that this is an in vitro plasma assay with no leech-related content whatsoever; any connection to hirudotherapy would be purely speculative.

Zitation

Rivaroxaban and apixaban are less effective than enoxaparin for the prevention of catheter-induced clotting invitro

Guan Z et al. · Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2022

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.