Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

The occurrence of antibodies to heparin-platelet factor 4 in cardiac and thoracic surgical patients receiving desirudin or heparin for postoperative venous thrombosis prophylaxis

Randomized study published in Thrombosis Research (2011)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungAvidan MS et al. · Thrombosis Research, 2011

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This randomized, exploratory study compared the incidence of heparin-dependent antibodies associated with subcutaneous (SC) desirudin or heparin given for deep-vein thrombosis prophylaxis following cardiac and thoracic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for elective cardiac or thoracic surgery received desirudin 15 mg SC twice daily or unfractionated heparin 5000 units SC thrice daily. Duration of thrombosis prophylaxis was determined by the treating physician. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of new antibody formation directed against platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex. Secondary outcomes included bleeding and thrombotic complications. Blood was tested for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies at baseline, after surgery prior to study drug administration, postdrug day (PDD) 2, PDD 7, and at 1 month. Doppler studies were done before discharge. RESULTS: Of 120 patients, 61 received desirudin, 59 received heparin. New PF4/heparin antibodies occurred in 10.2% and 13.6% of desirudin- and heparin-treated patients, respectively. Among desirudin patients with no heparin exposure, none (0/36) developed PF4/heparin antibodies versus 17.1% with heparin exposure. Incidence of deep venous thrombosis was 4.9% and 3.4% in the desirudin and heparin groups, respectively. Two heparin-group patients developed pulmonary embolism. Two patients per group had bleeding events; no patients required re-exploration for bleeding complications. Median chest tube output was similar with desirudin (900 mL) and heparin (692 mL) as was blood transfusion requirements of more than 2 units (5/61, desirudin; 2/59 heparin). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of thrombotic events was low in both groups. There were no safety concerns, and desirudin was not associated with anti-PF4/heparin antibodies.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAntibodiesAnticoagulantsCardiac Surgical ProceduresFemaleHeparinHirudinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPartial Thromboplastin TimePlatelet Factor 4Recombinant Proteins

Zusammenfassung

Randomized study in 120 cardiothoracic surgery patients: 0% of patients receiving only desirudin (no heparin) developed new PF4/heparin antibodies vs 17.1% with heparin exposure, supporting recombinant hirudin as an anti-PF4-antibody-free alternative.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This randomized, exploratory study of 120 patients compared subcutaneous desirudin with unfractionated heparin for postoperative deep-vein thrombosis prophylaxis after cardiac or thoracic surgery, assessing new anti-PF4/heparin antibody formation plus bleeding and thrombotic outcomes. New PF4/heparin antibodies occurred in 10.2% of desirudin patients versus 13.6% of heparin patients, and none of the 36 desirudin patients without heparin exposure developed such antibodies; thrombotic events were uncommon and no safety concerns were reported. The abstract itself does not mention leeches, hirudotherapy, or the leech secretome, so no defensible connection to ASH's hirudotherapy domain can be drawn from the abstract alone. Caveat: the study addresses a pharmaceutical anticoagulant rather than live leech therapy, and its exploratory findings would need confirmation in larger trials.

Zitation

The occurrence of antibodies to heparin-platelet factor 4 in cardiac and thoracic surgical patients receiving desirudin or heparin for postoperative venous thrombosis prophylaxis.

Avidan MS et al. · Thrombosis Research, 2011

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.