Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

An updated comprehensive meta-analysis of bivalirudin vs heparin use in primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Research article published in American heart journal (2016)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Meta-analysisDesarrollo de fármacosShah R et al. · American heart journal, 2016

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, the ideal anticoagulant for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. We performed an updated meta-analysis including recently reported randomized clinical trials that compare bivalirudin and heparin with or without provisional administration of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) for primary PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Scientific databases and Web sites were searched for randomized clinical trials. Data from 6 trials involving 14,095 patients were included. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random-effects models. Moderator analyses examined the impact of routine use of GPI, radial access, and P2Y12 inhibitors on safety outcomes. At 30 days, patients receiving bivalirudin had rates of major adverse cardiac events similar to those receiving heparin with or without provisional GPI (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.19, P = .800), myocardial infarction (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.94-2.11, P = .089), target vessel revascularization (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.91-2.04, P = .122), and net adverse clinical events (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.64-1.01, P = .069). However, bivalirudin use decreased the risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.99, P = .041) and cardiac mortality (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.91, P = .009) at 30 days, There were higher rates of acute stent thrombosis (RR 3.31, 95% CI 1.79-6.10, P < .001) in patients receiving bivalirudin. Bivalirudin use also decreased the risk of major bleeding at 30 days by 37% (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90, P = .012), but bleeding risk varied depending on routine GPI use with heparin (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.81, P = .009) vs bailout (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.42-1.25, P = .252), predominantly radial access (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.25-1.15, P = .114) vs non-radial access (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-0.99, P = .049), and second-generation P2Y12 inhibitor use with bivalirudin (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.40-1.24, P = .226) vs clopidogrel use (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.85, P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: In primary PCI, relative to heparin, bivalirudin reduces the risk for all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and major bleeding but yields similar rates of major adverse cardiac event and net adverse clinical event at 30 days. However, the benefit of a reduction in bleeding with bivalirudin appears to be modulated by the concurrent administration of second-generation P2Y12 inhibitors with bivalirudin, using radial access, and avoiding routine GPI use with heparin.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleMeta-AnalysisReview
Indexed MeSH termsAnticoagulantsAntithrombinsGlobal HealthHeparinHirudinsHumansIncidenceMyocardial InfarctionPeptide FragmentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPostoperative ComplicationsRecombinant Proteins

Resumen

Peer-reviewed leech-derived compound and anticoagulant pharmacology relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Este metaanálisis actualizado agrupó 6 RCT (14,095 pacientes) que compararon el DTI bivalirudin frente a heparin en PCI primaria, hallando que bivalirudin redujo la mortalidad por todas las causas, la mortalidad cardíaca y el sangrado mayor a los 30 días, mientras que aumentó la trombosis aguda del stent y produjo tasas similares de eventos cardíacos adversos mayores y eventos clínicos netos. La relevancia para la hirudoterapia es mecánica e histórica: bivalirudin es un DTI semisintético derivado de hirudin, descendiente del principio anticoagulante aislado por primera vez de la sanguijuela medicinal (Hirudo medicinalis/verbana), por lo que este conjunto de ensayos ilustra cómo una molécula del secretoma de la sanguijuela ha sido diseñada para convertirse en un fármaco cardiovascular convencional. Como advertencia, esta es evidencia de un análogo diseñado utilizado sistémicamente en cardiología intervencionista, no de la terapia con la sanguijuela completa; hace referencia al linaje de descubrimiento de fármacos derivados de la sanguijuela más que a cualquier afirmación clínica sobre la hirudoterapia en sí, y se demostró que el beneficio en el sangrado dependía en gran medida de la comedicación y la vía de acceso.

Citación

An updated comprehensive meta-analysis of bivalirudin vs heparin use in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Shah R et al. · American heart journal, 2016

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.