Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Argatroban anticoagulation for heparin induced thrombocytopenia in patients with ventricular assist devices

Research article published in Minerva anestesiologica (2012)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDesarrollo de fármacosPappalardo et al. · Minerva anestesiologica, 2012

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving implantation of ventricular assist devices (VAD) suffer a high incidence of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT); the occurrence of this condition is associated with increased complications and worse outcomes. We report our experience in the management of patients who were diagnosed with HIT either before (HITpre) or after (HITpost) implantation of VAD with argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor. METHODS: This retrospective analysis assessed data of VAD patients diagnosed with HIT at Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin between November 2005 and April 2009. Argatroban dose requirements, anticoagulation efficacy and adverse events (death, thromboembolism, bleeding) were recorded. Procedural success (discharge from the hospital, heart transplantation, or recovery of the failing heart) was also assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified (11 HITpre, 16 HITpost). Argatroban was effective in obtaining adequate anticoagulation with a reduced dose regimen (0.02-0.42 mcg/Kg/min starting dose; 0.02-1.5 mcg/Kg/min maintenance dose). We noted 5 thromboembolic complications (18%), 6 cases of major bleeding (22%) and 5 deaths (18%), all cause composite adverse end point occurring in 40% of patients. Procedural success was obtained in 81% of patients (92% HITpre, 69% HITpost). As compared to historical controls of patients treated with lepirudin in the period 2000-2005, results were significantly improved. CONCLUSION: Argatroban anticoagulation is feasible in patients with HIT after VAD implantation, without increasing bleeding risk. Its impact in terms of survival should be reviewed also in the light of the technological improvements of assist devices.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeEvaluation StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAdultAgedAnticoagulantsArginineFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart TransplantationHeart-Assist DevicesHeparinHospital MortalityHumansIncidence

Resumen

Peer-reviewed pharmacology and drug-development research relevant to anticoagulants and leech-derived compounds. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Este análisis retrospectivo de 27 pacientes con dispositivo de asistencia ventricular (VAD) con trombocitopenia inducida por heparina (HIT) informó que el inhibidor directo de la trombina argatroban logró una anticoagulación adecuada a dosis reducidas sin aumentar el riesgo de sangrado, con un éxito procedimental del 81% y resultados significativamente mejorados en comparación con controles históricos tratados con lepirudina (un hirudina recombinante). La relevancia de la hirudoterapia reside en el hilo del descubrimiento de fármacos del secretoma: hirudina, el anticoagulante natural de la sanguijuela, fue el inhibidor directo de la trombina prototipo, y este estudio se sitúa en la línea de los anticoagulantes inspirados en la sanguijuela al benchmarking argatroban contra el análogo de hirudina lepirudina. Este es un pequeño estudio retrospectivo monocéntrico con un comparador histórico (no aleatorizado), por lo que es preliminar y se refiere a un agente sintético en lugar de la terapia de sanguijuela o la hirudina nativa en sí.

Citación

Argatroban anticoagulation for heparin induced thrombocytopenia in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Pappalardo et al. · Minerva anestesiologica, 2012

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 29, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.