Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Systematic review of drug-drug interactions between rifamycins and anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents and considerations for management.

Review published in Pharmacotherapy (2022)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Systematic reviewDesarrollo de fármacosEnsayos clínicosMacDougall C et al. · Pharmacotherapy, 2022

Abstract

Rifamycins (rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine) play an essential role in the treatment of mycobacterial and some nonmycobacterial infections. They also induce the activity of various drug transporting and metabolizing enzymes, which can impact the concentrations and efficacy of substrates. Many anticoagulant and antiplatelet (AC/AP) agents are substrates of these enzymes and have narrow therapeutic indices, leading to risks of thrombosis or bleeding when coadministered with rifamycins. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects on AC/AP pharmacokinetics, laboratory markers, and clinical safety and efficacy of combined use with rifamycins. A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidance was performed. The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were queried for English-language reports on combination use of rifamycins and AC/AP agents from database inception through August 2021. The 29 studies identified examined warfarin (n = 17), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (n = 8), and antiplatelet agents (n = 4) combined with rifampin (n = 28) or rifabutin (n = 1). Eleven studies were case reports or small case series; 14 reported on pharmacokinetic or laboratory markers in healthy volunteers. Rifampin-warfarin combinations led to reductions in warfarin area under the curve (AUC) of 15%-74%, with variability by warfarin isomer and study. Warfarin dose increases of up to 3-5 times prerifampin doses were required to maintain coagulation parameters in the therapeutic range. DOAC AUCs were decreased by 20%-67%, with variability by individual agent and with rifampin versus rifabutin. The active metabolite of clopidogrel increased substantially with rifampin coadministration, whereas prasugrel was largely unaffected and ticagrelor saw decreases. Our review suggests most combinations of AC/AP agents and rifampin are problematic. Further studies are required to determine whether rifabutin or rifapentine could be safe alternatives for coadministration with AC/AP drugs.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleSystematic Review
Indexed MeSH termsAnticoagulantsDrug InteractionsHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRifabutinRifampinRifamycinsWarfarin

Resumen

Rifamycins (rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine) play an essential role in the treatment of mycobacterial and some nonmycobacterial infections. They also induce the activity of various drug transporting and metabolizing enzymes, which can impact the concentrations and efficacy of substrates.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Esta revisión sistemática (guiada por PRISMA, 29 estudios hasta agosto de 2021) examinó cómo los antibióticos rifamicínicos —potentes inductores de las enzimas de transporte y metabolismo de fármacos— interactúan con agentes anticoagulantes y antiplaquetarios, hallando que la rifampicina redujo la exposición a warfarin (AUC disminuyó 15-74%) y a menudo requirió dosis de warfarin hasta 3-5 veces más altas, alterando asimismo la actividad de los antiplaquetarios y anticoagulantes orales directos (p. ej., clopidogrel, ticagrelor); los autores concluyen que la mayoría de las combinaciones de rifampicina/anticoagulante son problemáticas. Para ASH, esto es un recordatorio de que los anticoagulantes orales convencionales son vulnerables a interacciones fármaco-fármaco clínicamente significativas y a la variabilidad metabólica, una de las presiones prácticas que mantiene científicamente interesante la búsqueda de mecanismos antitrombóticos alternativos —incluyendo los péptidos de acción directa del secretoma de la sanguijuela (p. ej., inhibidores de la trombina de la clase hirudin/bivalirudin)—. Advertencia honesta: esta revisión trata sobre las interacciones entre fármacos existentes y no dice nada sobre la terapia con sanguijuelas; gran parte de su base de evidencia consiste en reportes de casos y estudios farmacocinéticos pequeños en voluntarios sanos, y ASH la presenta únicamente como contexto del campo, no como respaldo para ninguna intervención basada en sanguijuelas.

Citación

Systematic review of drug-drug interactions between rifamycins and anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents and considerations for management.

MacDougall C et al. · Pharmacotherapy, 2022

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.