Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Anticoagulant for treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism patients with renal dysfunction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Systematic review published in Frontiers in medicine (2022)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Systematic reviewEnsayos clínicosFan G et al. · Frontiers in medicine, 2022

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety for particular regimen and dosage in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients with renal insufficiency. METHODS: English language searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (inception to May 2021). RCTs evaluating anticoagulants for VTE treatment at acute phase, extension phase, and VTE prophylaxis in patients with renal insufficiency and reporting efficacy (death, recurrence, or occurrence of VTE) and safety (bleeding) outcomes were selected. The methodological quality of each study included was assessed at the outcome level using the risk-of-bias assessment tool developed by the Cochrane Bias Methods Group. RESULTS: Twenty-one trials that involved 76,574 participants and 8,972 (11.7%) patients with renal insufficiency were enrolled, including 10 trials on VTE treatment in acute phase (3-12 months), four trials on VTE treatment in extension phase (6-36 months), and seven trials for VTE prophylaxis. For acute VTE treatment, compared with dabigatran etexilate, apixaban (RR 5.90, 95%CI 1.00-34.60) and rivaroxaban (RR 6.18, 95%CI 1.17-32.75) were significantly associated with increased risk of death or recurrence. For extension treatment of VTE, aspirin had the highest probability of the most effective and safest treatment, followed by apixaban. For VTE prophylaxis, compared with enoxaparin, desirudin was associated with lower risk of VTE occurrence (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.91), but had higher risk of bleeding than dabigatran etexilate. CONCLUSION: The network meta-analysis informs the optimal choice of anticoagulants and their particular dosage for treatment and prophylaxis of VTE patients comorbid renal insufficiency. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021254086.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeSystematic ReviewJournal Article

Resumen

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety for particular regimen and dosage in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients with renal insufficiency.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared anticoagulant regimens for VTE treatment and prophylaxis in patients with renal insufficiency, analyzing 21 trials with 76,574 participants. Among the findings, desirudin was associated with a lower risk of VTE occurrence than enoxaparin for prophylaxis (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34–0.91) but had a higher risk of bleeding than dabigatran etexilate. For ASH's domain, the relevance is indirect: the abstract identifies desirudin only as one of several anticoagulant comparators without characterizing its biochemical origin or relationship to hirudin. The analysis focuses on pharmacologic anticoagulants and renal-dosing optimization rather than hirudotherapy or the leech secretome.

Citación

Anticoagulant for treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism patients with renal dysfunction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Fan G et al. · Frontiers in medicine, 2022

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.