Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in coronary artery disease patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease: Meta-analysis
Meta-analysis published in Journal of Cardiology (2017)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have elevated bleeding and ischemic outcomes. We aim to assess the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of bivalirudin compared to heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with CKD. METHODS: Randomized trials were searched in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases up to January 2017. Among the trials retrieved, efficacy endpoints were defined as mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Safety endpoints were reported as non-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) related major bleeding and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for each outcome using a fixed effect model. RESULTS: Five studies with a total of 3796 patients were included. In short-term follow up (30 days), bivalirudin significantly reduced non-CABG related major bleeding (p=0.0004) and TIMI major bleeding (p=0.007) compared to heparin plus GPIs. No significant differences were observed in rates of mortality, MI, repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis, and MACEs between the two groups in short- and long-term follow up (6 months to 3 years). In patients with ST elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) with concurrent CKD, the decreased non-CABG related major bleeding (p=0.04) without increasing ischemic events was also observed after short-term follow up. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Bivalirudin is safer than and as effective as heparin plus GPIs in CAD patients with CKD. (2) Impaired renal function does not affect the safety benefits of bivalirudin. (3) Similar efficacy profiles were identified between the two groups after both short- and long-term follow up in the CAD patients with CKD.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Meta-analysis of 5 trials totaling 3796 CAD patients with CKD: bivalirudin significantly reduced non-CABG major bleeding (p=0.0004) and TIMI major bleeding (p=0.007) vs heparin plus GPIs at 30 days, with no difference in ischemic outcomes.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese Meta-Analyse von fünf randomisierten Studien (3.796 Patienten) verglich Bivalirudin versus Heparin plus Glykoprotein-IIb/IIIa-Inhibitoren bei Patienten mit koronarer Herzkrankheit und chronischer Nierenerkrankung (CKD). Bivalirudin reduzierte signifikant die nicht-CABG-bedingten schweren Blutungen sowie TIMI-schwere Blutungen im Kurzzeit-Follow-up (30 Tage), ohne signifikante Unterschiede hinsichtlich Mortalität, Myokardinfarkt, erneuter Revaskularisation, Stentthrombose oder schwerer unerwünschter kardialer Ereignisse im Kurz- oder Langzeit-Follow-up. Die Relevanz für ASH ist indirekt: Bivalirudin ist ein direkter Thrombin-Inhibitor, der auf der ursprünglich aus dem Speichel des medizinischen Blutegels stammenden Hirudin-Vorlage basiert. Allerdings waren keine Blutegel, keine Blutegeltherapie und keine aus Blutegeln gewonnenen Extrakte involviert, und der Abstract spezifiziert den CKD-Schweregrad nicht über 'chronische Nierenerkrankung' hinaus; die Relevanz besteht ausschließlich über die pharmakologische Abstammung eines synthetischen Analogons.
Zitation
Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in coronary artery disease patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease: Meta-analysis.
Zeng X et al. · Journal of Cardiology, 2017
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026