Venous thromboembolism after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of incidence, risk factors, and international guidelines

PURPOSE: This review aims to systematically evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and international guideline discrepancies for venous thromboembolism (VTE) following hip arthroscopy (HA). METHODOLOGY: A search of four databases from the inception to April 20, 2025, identified studies reporting VTE outcomes post-HA. Relevant practice guideline recommendations were concurrently analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies encompassing 135,377 patients and five clinical guidelines were included. Female patients constituted 91,013 cases (67.2%). The mean patient age was 37.08 years; however, the average follow-up duration was limited to 3.7 months, which may be a study limitation. Pooled incidence rates were: deep vein thrombosis (DVT) 0.441%, pulmonary embolism (PE) 0.216%, and overall VTE 0.656%. The majority of studies were Level IV evidence (57%), with Level III evidence comprising 33%. Identified risk factors for post-HA VTE included obesity, oral contraceptive use, ≥45 years, overweight status, coagulopathy, and arteriovenous anomalies. The reported VTE incidence ranged from 0% to 6.94%. International guidelines vary, but most advocate for risk-stratified thromboprophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VTE following hip arthroscopy is low. Routine pharmacological thromboprophylaxis may not be necessary for standard-risk patients. However, high-risk individuals warrant personalized prophylaxis regimens, with pharmacological prophylaxis when clinically indicated based on risk assessment.

Abstract aus PubMed (NCBI) für den zitierten Eintrag, in der Originalsprache wiedergegeben. Maßgeblich ist die Fassung der Originalpublikation.

Das Abstract wird nicht übersetzt, damit die eigene Wortwahl der Autoren erhalten bleibt.

Systematic review of 21 studies (135,377 patients) found low venous thromboembolism incidence after hip arthroscopy (0.656% overall), with risk factors including obesity and age ≥45 years, and concluded routine pharmacological thromboprophylaxis may be unnecessary for standard-risk patients.

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Weitere begutachtete Studien in der Kategorie „Klinische Studien“.

• Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Auswirkungen der Hirudotherapie auf Leberfunktionen, Lipidprofil und Insulinsensitivität bei Ratten mit metabolischem Syndrom — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
• Investigation of the therapeutic effects of medicinal leech treatment on lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion injury — Ünal K et al. (2026)
• Wirksamkeit der Therapie mit medizinischen Blutegeln bei unterschiedlichen klinischen Anwendungen: Eine umfassende Studie aus Aserbaidschan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
• Hirudotherapy in Wound Healing — Nair H et al. (2022)
• Improvement of patient care through hirudotherapy and the management of leeches from their reception to their disposal in France — Vaesken C et al. (2023)

Alle von der ASH analysierten Studien →