Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in bivalirudin-treated patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: The BRIGHT-4 trial

Randomized controlled trial (post-hoc) published in Cardiovasc Revasc Med (2025)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungLi Y et al. · Cardiovascular revascularization medicine, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The optimal antiplatelet agent regimen in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) with bivalirudin anticoagulation is uncertain. This analysis sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI with radial artery access and bivalirudin anticoagulation. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis compared bivalirudin plus ticagrelor with bivalirudin plus clopidogrel in 3009 BRIGHT-4 patients that were treated with PPCI. The primary endpoint was all-cause death or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3-5 bleeding occurring within 30 days. RESULTS: The 30-day all-cause death or BARC types 3-5 bleeding occurred in 2.0 % of patients treated with ticagrelor vs. 3.9 % of patients treated with clopidogrel (HR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.29 to 0.89; P = 0.02), driven by a reduction in all-cause death with ticagrelor (1.9 % vs. 3.7 %; P = 0.02) with no difference in BARC types 3-5 bleeding (0.1 % vs. 0.3 %; P = 0.34), although BARC type 2 bleeding was increased with ticagrelor (2.7 % vs. 1.2 %; P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between two groups in risk of stent thrombosis and composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, or stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI treated with PPCI, the risk of the composite of all-cause mortality and BARC types 3-5 bleeding at 30 days was lower with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel on a background of bivalirudin, without an increase in stent thrombosis and major bleedings.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
Indexed MeSH termsHumansHirudinsTicagrelorMaleST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionFemalePeptide FragmentsClopidogrelMiddle AgedAgedPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Zusammenfassung

Post-hoc analysis of 3009 STEMI patients in the BRIGHT-4 RCT comparing ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel on a bivalirudin background during primary PCI. Ticagrelor reduced 30-day all-cause death/major bleeding composite without increasing stent thrombosis.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

Recent randomized data anchoring the role of leech-derived bivalirudin in contemporary acute coronary syndrome management.

Zitation

Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in bivalirudin-treated patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: The BRIGHT-4 trial.

Li Y et al. · Cardiovascular revascularization medicine, 2025

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.