Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in bivalirudin-treated patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: The BRIGHT-4 trial
Randomized controlled trial (post-hoc) published in Cardiovasc Revasc Med (2025)
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The optimal antiplatelet agent regimen in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) with bivalirudin anticoagulation is uncertain. This analysis sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI with radial artery access and bivalirudin anticoagulation. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis compared bivalirudin plus ticagrelor with bivalirudin plus clopidogrel in 3009 BRIGHT-4 patients that were treated with PPCI. The primary endpoint was all-cause death or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3-5 bleeding occurring within 30 days. RESULTS: The 30-day all-cause death or BARC types 3-5 bleeding occurred in 2.0 % of patients treated with ticagrelor vs. 3.9 % of patients treated with clopidogrel (HR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.29 to 0.89; P = 0.02), driven by a reduction in all-cause death with ticagrelor (1.9 % vs. 3.7 %; P = 0.02) with no difference in BARC types 3-5 bleeding (0.1 % vs. 0.3 %; P = 0.34), although BARC type 2 bleeding was increased with ticagrelor (2.7 % vs. 1.2 %; P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between two groups in risk of stent thrombosis and composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, or stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI treated with PPCI, the risk of the composite of all-cause mortality and BARC types 3-5 bleeding at 30 days was lower with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel on a background of bivalirudin, without an increase in stent thrombosis and major bleedings.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Post-hoc analysis of 3009 STEMI patients in the BRIGHT-4 RCT comparing ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel on a bivalirudin background during primary PCI. Ticagrelor reduced 30-day all-cause death/major bleeding composite without increasing stent thrombosis.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese Post-hoc-Analyse verglich Ticagrelor mit Clopidogrel bei 3.009 STEMI-Patienten, die sich einer primären perkutanen Koronarintervention mit Bivalirudin-Antikoagulation und radialem Zugang unterzogen und aus der BRIGHT-4-Patientenpopulation stammten. Der zusammengesetzte Endpunkt aus Gesamtsterblichkeit oder BARC-Blutungstypen 3–5 nach 30 Tagen war unter Ticagrelor niedriger (2,0 % vs. 3,9 %, HR 0,51, P=0,02), getragen von einer reduzierten Mortalität, wobei jedoch BARC-Blutungen vom Typ 2 zunahmen. Das Abstract erwähnt weder Hirudin, Blutegel noch Blutegeltherapie, und es lässt sich keine vertretbare Verbindung zur Hirudotherapie oder zum Blutegelsekretom aus diesem Artikel herleiten. Diese Studie ist nicht relevant für das Fachgebiet der ASH.
Zitation
Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in bivalirudin-treated patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: The BRIGHT-4 trial.
Li Y et al. · Cardiovascular revascularization medicine, 2025
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026