Atrial Fibrillation Detected before or after Stroke: Role of Anticoagulation
Research article published in Annals of neurology (2023)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) known before ischemic stroke (KAF) has been postulated to be an independent category with a recurrence risk higher than that of AF detected after stroke (AFDAS). However, it is unknown whether this risk difference is confounded by pre-existing anticoagulation, which is most common in KAF and also indicates a high ischemic stroke recurrence risk. METHODS: Individual patient data analysis from 5 prospective cohorts of anticoagulated patients following AF-associated ischemic stroke. We compared the primary (ischemic stroke recurrence) and secondary outcome (all-cause death) among patients with AFDAS versus KAF and among anticoagulation-naïve versus previously anticoagulated patients using multivariable Cox, Fine-Gray models, and goodness-of-fit statistics to investigate the relative independent prognostic importance of AF-category and pre-existing anticoagulation. RESULTS: Of 4,357 patients, 1,889 (43%) had AFDAS and 2,468 (57%) had KAF, while 3,105 (71%) were anticoagulation-naïve before stroke and 1,252 (29%) were previously anticoagulated. During 6,071 patient-years of follow-up, we observed 244 recurrent strokes and 661 deaths. Only pre-existing anticoagulation (but not KAF) was independently associated with a higher hazard for stroke recurrence in both Cox and Fine-Gray models. Models incorporating pre-existing anticoagulation showed better fit than those with AF category; adding AF-category did not result in better model fit. Neither pre-existing anticoagulation nor KAF were independently associated with death. CONCLUSION: Our findings challenge the notion that KAF and AFDAS are clinically relevant and distinct prognostic entities. Instead of attributing an independently high stroke recurrence risk to KAF, future research should focus on the causes of stroke despite anticoagulation to develop improved preventive treatments. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:43-54.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to anticoagulation, leech therapy, and microsurgical flap management. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Durch die Zusammenführung individueller Patientendaten aus fünf prospektiven Kohorten mit 4.357 antikoagulierten Patienten nach einem AF-assoziierten ischämischen Schlaganfall ergab diese Analyse, dass eine vorbestehende Antikoagulation (nicht der Zeitpunkt der AF-Detektion vor oder nach dem Schlaganfall) unabhängig mit einem höheren Risiko für einen erneuten Schlaganfall verbunden war, was die Vorstellung in Frage stellt, dass „bekanntes AF“ und „nach dem Schlaganfall entdecktes AF“ unterschiedliche prognostische Entitäten seien. Für die ASH belegt dies, dass systemische Antikoagulanzien wiederkehrende thrombotische Ereignisse nicht vollständig verhindern — Teil des umfassenderen Kontexts des ungedeckten Bedarfs, der das Interesse an neuartigen antithrombotischen Mechanismen einschließlich Molekülen des Egelsekretoms motiviert. Vorbehalt: Dies ist eine beobachtende Kohortenanalyse der systemischen oralen Antikoagulation in der Schlaganfallprävention; sie hat keinen Bezug zu Egeln oder zur Hirudotherapie und trägt die üblichen Confounding-Grenzen nicht-randomisierter Daten.
Zitation
Atrial Fibrillation Detected before or after Stroke: Role of Anticoagulation.
Lyrer et al. · Annals of neurology, 2023
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026