Association Between Argatroban and Outcomes of Branch Atheromatous Disease: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From MRI-Based Study
Research article published in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics (2025)
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Argatroban is widely used for patients with acute branch atheromatous disease (BAD)-related stroke, but its efficacy remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate its clinical outcomes in this patient population. METHODS: A prospective, MRI-based cohort (BAD-study) was conducted across 20 hospitals in China from June 2021 to June 2023, enrolling patients aged 18-80 years with BAD-related stroke within 72 h of onset. Patients were divided into two groups: Argatroban and non-argatroban. The primary outcome was an excellent outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included good outcome (mRS 0-2), mRS score, Barthel Index score at 90 days, and NIHSS score at 7 days. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between argatroban and outcomes after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 467 patients were included, with a median age of 60 years and a median NIHSS score of 4 at admission. Eighty-six patients (18.4%) were in the argatroban group, and 381 patients (81.6%) were in the non-argatroban group. After PSM, excellent outcomes occurred in 60.0% of the argatroban group and 64.2% of the non-argatroban group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.47-1.49, p = 0.542). Argatroban was not significantly associated with secondary outcomes and remained ineffective in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Argatroban was not associated with excellent outcome at 90 days in patients with acute BAD-related stroke. Our study suggests that the risks and benefits of argatroban need reevaluation in patients with BAD-related stroke.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Peer-reviewed pharmacology and drug-development research relevant to anticoagulants and leech-derived compounds. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
In dieser prospektiven, MRT-basierten multizentrischen Kohorte von 467 Patienten mit einem akuten Schlaganfall im Zusammenhang mit der Branch Atheromatous Disease (BAD) war argatroban (ein direkter Thrombininhibitor) nach Propensity-Score-Matching nicht mit einem exzellenten Ergebnis nach 90 Tagen assoziiert (60,0% vs. 64,2%; OR 0,84, 95%-KI 0,47–1,49, p=0,542) und zeigte keinen Nutzen bei den sekundären Endpunkten, was die Autoren zu der Forderung veranlasste, das Nutzen-Risiko-Verhältnis in dieser Gruppe neu zu bewerten. Der Bezug zur Hirudotherapie ist indirekt, über die Herkunft des Sekretoms: argatroban gehört zur Klasse der direkten Thrombininhibitoren, für die das aus dem Blutegel gewonnene hirudin der natürliche Prototyp war, sodass dies eine nüchterne Erinnerung daran ist, dass Thrombininhibitor-Antikoagulanzien nicht bei jeder Indikation von Nutzen sind. Die Studie ist beobachtend (nicht randomisiert) und prüft ein synthetisches Medikament bei einem bestimmten Schlaganfall-Subtyp, nicht die Blutegeltherapie oder natives hirudin.
Zitation
Association Between Argatroban and Outcomes of Branch Atheromatous Disease: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From MRI-Based Study.
Li et al. · CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 29, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026