Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Platelet responsiveness to aspirin in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A prospective cohort study

Research article published in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2026)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportKlinische StudienMarathe et al. · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aspirin at 3 to 5 mg/kg is the cornerstone of thromboprophylaxis in pediatric cardiac surgery. The reported prevalence of aspirin unresponsiveness is 1% to 35% in adults and 10% to 15% in children. The present study aimed to (1) describe the prevalence of aspirin responsiveness in the pediatric cardiac surgical population using light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the gold standard; (2) evaluate the dose-dependent response to aspirin; (3) compare LTA with point-of-care thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM); and (4) describe adverse events and report a risk factor analysis. METHODS: This prospective cohort study (Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001879257) was conducted from 2022 to 2024 in a quaternary children's hospital and included patients age 0 to 18 years who required aspirin prophylaxis after cardiac surgery. Patients who were allergic to aspirin or received other anticoagulants, such as warfarin, were excluded. Aspirin responsiveness was tested after at least 3 days of a standard aspirin dose of 5 mg/kg or 150 mg (whichever was less). LTA showing ≥20% platelet aggregation stimulated by arachidonic acid or ≥70% platelet aggregation to adenosine diphosphate denoted aspirin unresponsiveness. To evaluate TEG-PM compared to the gold standard (LTA), TEG-PM showing ≥50% platelet aggregation denoted aspirin unresponsiveness. The dose was increased to 10 mg/kg in these patients, and aspirin responsiveness was reevaluated. Those patients still not responding were labeled "aspirin-resistant." RESULTS: The 133 eligible patients included 77 males (58%), 49 with a single ventricle (37%), and 119 who underwent surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (89%). The most common indications for aspirin were shunts/Fontan in single ventricle patients (n = 44; 33%) and valve repair/replacement (n = 25; 19%). The median patient age was 1.9 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.13-12 years), and the median weight was 15.1 kg (IQR, 4.2-44.1 kg). Twenty-four patients (18%) did not respond to the standard aspirin dose, and the dose was increased in 23 patients (17%). Twenty patients (15%) were tested a second time; 13 (10%) responded to the increased aspirin dose (10 mg/kg). Seven patients (5%) were aspirin-resistant. There was no correlation between the results of aspirin responsiveness tested using LTA and TEG-PM (P = .167). There were no identifiable risk factors for aspirin unresponsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Almost 20% of pediatric cardiac surgical patients do not respond to a standard 5 mg/kg aspirin dose. Most non-responders have a dose-dependent response to aspirin. Only 5% of patients are genuinely aspirin-resistant (as defined by LTA). TEG-PM does not correlate with the gold standard LTA test to determine aspirin responsiveness. Testing for aspirin responsiveness should be considered in patients undergoing pediatric cardiac surgery who are at risk of clinically significant thrombosis; however, further evidence with correlation to clinical outcomes is needed to define the utility of testing for aspirin responsiveness.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansAspirinMaleCardiac Surgical ProceduresFemaleChild, PreschoolProspective StudiesInfantChildAdolescentPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Aggregation

Zusammenfassung

Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

Diese prospektive Kohortenstudie mit 133 Kindern, die sich einer Herzoperation unterzogen, ergab, dass fast 20% nicht auf eine Standarddosis von 5 mg/kg aspirin ansprachen, die meisten bei Steigerung auf 10 mg/kg ein dosisabhängiges Ansprechen zeigten, nur etwa 5% nach dem Goldstandard der Lichttransmissionsaggregometrie echt aspirin-resistent waren und dass das Point-of-Care-TEG-Thrombozytenmapping nicht mit diesem Goldstandard korrelierte. Ihre Relevanz für die Hirudotherapie liegt im übergeordneten Thema des antithrombotischen Monitorings – sie unterstreicht, dass thrombozytengerichtete Therapie variabel wirksam ist und dass sich die Testmethoden widersprechen, eine nützliche Erinnerung bei der Überlegung, wie die antikoagulatorischen Effekte der Blutegeltherapie beurteilt oder mit thrombozytenhemmenden Regimen kombiniert würden. Der Vorbehalt ist, dass dies eine pharmakodynamische Studie zu einem Thrombozytenhemmer (aspirin) in der pädiatrischen Herzchirurgie ohne Blutegel- oder Blutegelsekretom-Komponente ist; sie betrifft die Hirudotherapie nur als allgemeinen Kontext zur antithrombotischen Variabilität und Überwachung.

Zitation

Platelet responsiveness to aspirin in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A prospective cohort study.

Marathe et al. · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.