Platelet responsiveness to aspirin in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A prospective cohort study
Research article published in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2026)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aspirin at 3 to 5 mg/kg is the cornerstone of thromboprophylaxis in pediatric cardiac surgery. The reported prevalence of aspirin unresponsiveness is 1% to 35% in adults and 10% to 15% in children. The present study aimed to (1) describe the prevalence of aspirin responsiveness in the pediatric cardiac surgical population using light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the gold standard; (2) evaluate the dose-dependent response to aspirin; (3) compare LTA with point-of-care thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM); and (4) describe adverse events and report a risk factor analysis. METHODS: This prospective cohort study (Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001879257) was conducted from 2022 to 2024 in a quaternary children's hospital and included patients age 0 to 18 years who required aspirin prophylaxis after cardiac surgery. Patients who were allergic to aspirin or received other anticoagulants, such as warfarin, were excluded. Aspirin responsiveness was tested after at least 3 days of a standard aspirin dose of 5 mg/kg or 150 mg (whichever was less). LTA showing ≥20% platelet aggregation stimulated by arachidonic acid or ≥70% platelet aggregation to adenosine diphosphate denoted aspirin unresponsiveness. To evaluate TEG-PM compared to the gold standard (LTA), TEG-PM showing ≥50% platelet aggregation denoted aspirin unresponsiveness. The dose was increased to 10 mg/kg in these patients, and aspirin responsiveness was reevaluated. Those patients still not responding were labeled "aspirin-resistant." RESULTS: The 133 eligible patients included 77 males (58%), 49 with a single ventricle (37%), and 119 who underwent surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (89%). The most common indications for aspirin were shunts/Fontan in single ventricle patients (n = 44; 33%) and valve repair/replacement (n = 25; 19%). The median patient age was 1.9 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.13-12 years), and the median weight was 15.1 kg (IQR, 4.2-44.1 kg). Twenty-four patients (18%) did not respond to the standard aspirin dose, and the dose was increased in 23 patients (17%). Twenty patients (15%) were tested a second time; 13 (10%) responded to the increased aspirin dose (10 mg/kg). Seven patients (5%) were aspirin-resistant. There was no correlation between the results of aspirin responsiveness tested using LTA and TEG-PM (P = .167). There were no identifiable risk factors for aspirin unresponsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Almost 20% of pediatric cardiac surgical patients do not respond to a standard 5 mg/kg aspirin dose. Most non-responders have a dose-dependent response to aspirin. Only 5% of patients are genuinely aspirin-resistant (as defined by LTA). TEG-PM does not correlate with the gold standard LTA test to determine aspirin responsiveness. Testing for aspirin responsiveness should be considered in patients undergoing pediatric cardiac surgery who are at risk of clinically significant thrombosis; however, further evidence with correlation to clinical outcomes is needed to define the utility of testing for aspirin responsiveness.
Abstract aus PubMed (NCBI) für den zitierten Eintrag, in der Originalsprache wiedergegeben. Maßgeblich ist die Fassung der Originalpublikation.
Das Abstract wird nicht übersetzt, damit die eigene Wortwahl der Autoren erhalten bleibt.
Zusammenfassung
This prospective cohort of 133 pediatric cardiac surgery patients found 18% did not respond to standard 5 mg/kg aspirin by light transmission aggregometry. Most non-responders had dose-dependent responses, and thromboelastography platelet mapping did not correlate with the gold standard.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese prospektive Kohortenstudie mit 133 Kindern, die sich einer Herzoperation unterzogen, ergab, dass fast 20% nicht auf eine Standarddosis von 5 mg/kg aspirin ansprachen, die meisten bei Steigerung auf 10 mg/kg ein dosisabhängiges Ansprechen zeigten, nur etwa 5% nach dem Goldstandard der Lichttransmissionsaggregometrie echt aspirin-resistent waren und dass das Point-of-Care-TEG-Thrombozytenmapping nicht mit diesem Goldstandard korrelierte. Ihre Relevanz für die Hirudotherapie liegt im übergeordneten Thema des antithrombotischen Monitorings – sie unterstreicht, dass thrombozytengerichtete Therapie variabel wirksam ist und dass sich die Testmethoden widersprechen, eine nützliche Erinnerung bei der Überlegung, wie die antikoagulatorischen Effekte der Blutegeltherapie beurteilt oder mit thrombozytenhemmenden Regimen kombiniert würden. Der Vorbehalt ist, dass dies eine pharmakodynamische Studie zu einem Thrombozytenhemmer (aspirin) in der pädiatrischen Herzchirurgie ohne Blutegel- oder Blutegelsekretom-Komponente ist; sie betrifft die Hirudotherapie nur als allgemeinen Kontext zur antithrombotischen Variabilität und Überwachung.
Zitation
Platelet responsiveness to aspirin in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A prospective cohort study.
Marathe et al. · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Verwandte Forschungsarbeiten
Weitere begutachtete Studien in der Kategorie „Klinische Studien“.
- Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
- Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
- Auswirkungen der Hirudotherapie auf Leberfunktionen, Lipidprofil und Insulinsensitivität bei Ratten mit metabolischem Syndrom — Bilden A et al. (2026)
- Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
- Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
- Investigation of the therapeutic effects of medicinal leech treatment on lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion injury — Ünal K et al. (2026)
- Wirksamkeit der Therapie mit medizinischen Blutegeln bei unterschiedlichen klinischen Anwendungen: Eine umfassende Studie aus Aserbaidschan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
- HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
- Hirudotherapy in Wound Healing — Nair H et al. (2022)
- Improvement of patient care through hirudotherapy and the management of leeches from their reception to their disposal in France — Vaesken C et al. (2023)
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: 28. Mai 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026