Learning microvascular anastomosis: Analysis of practice patterns.

Performing a successful microsurgical vascular anastomosis (MVA) is challenging and requires lots of practice. However, the most efficient practice protocol is yet to be found. We aimed to compare and analyze two major practice patterns for fine motor tasks as applied to learning MVA: distributed and mass practice protocols. Ten neurosurgeons with comparable experience in microsurgery (but no experience in vascular anastomosis) were randomized to practice MVA either using a distributed (1 session/day) or a mass practice (6 sessions/day) protocol. A total of 24 sessions of practice and 2 recall test sessions were given. Anastomosis score, time to complete a single stitch and the total time to complete an anastomosis were recorded. Mass practice protocol caused a clear fatigue effect observed toward the end of each mass practice trial block. Statistical comparison using one-way analysis of variance showed significantly higher anastomosis scores and shorter times to place a single stitch as well as to complete the anastomosis in distributed practice group for the last 3 acquisition practice trials, and the 2 recall tests (p < 0.05). The relative advantage of the distributed practice protocol could be attributed to forgetting/spacing effect. Although mass practice protocol resulted in worse performance, it still showed a gradual improvement trend in performance from beginning to the end. Therefore, certain adjustments to a mass practice protocol (such as increasing the number of practice blocks) could potentially lead to an eventual performance level comparable to a distributed protocol. This point is a subject of further investigation.

Abstract aus PubMed (NCBI) für den zitierten Eintrag, in der Originalsprache wiedergegeben. Maßgeblich ist die Fassung der Originalpublikation.

Das Abstract wird nicht übersetzt, damit die eigene Wortwahl der Autoren erhalten bleibt.

In a randomized study of ten neurosurgeons learning microvascular anastomosis, distributed practice (one session/day) produced significantly higher scores and shorter stitch and anastomosis times than mass practice (six sessions/day) in the final trials and recall tests, though mass practice still improved gradually.

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Weitere begutachtete Studien in der Kategorie „Klinische Studien“.

• Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Auswirkungen der Hirudotherapie auf Leberfunktionen, Lipidprofil und Insulinsensitivität bei Ratten mit metabolischem Syndrom — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
• Investigation of the therapeutic effects of medicinal leech treatment on lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion injury — Ünal K et al. (2026)
• Wirksamkeit der Therapie mit medizinischen Blutegeln bei unterschiedlichen klinischen Anwendungen: Eine umfassende Studie aus Aserbaidschan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
• Hirudotherapy in Wound Healing — Nair H et al. (2022)
• Improvement of patient care through hirudotherapy and the management of leeches from their reception to their disposal in France — Vaesken C et al. (2023)

Alle von der ASH analysierten Studien →