Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with acute aortic and renal thrombosis in a patient treated with low-molecular-weight heparin

Case report published in Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2005)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Case reportArzneimittelentwicklungKlinische StudienChevalier J et al. · European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2005

Abstract

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare but serious complication of heparin therapy. Most of cases are related to unfractionated heparin, but a few are due to low molecular weight heparin sometimes associated with unfractionated heparin. A patient with pulmonary contusions after chest injury developed a catheter related subclavian vein thrombosis on day 16. He was treated by increasing doses of low molecular weight heparin. Aortic and renal thromboses occurred on day 21. Surgical thrombectomy, performed after starting alternative anticoagulation treatment led to complete arterial recovery. In case of suspicion of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin, heparin treatment must be discontinued before the results of biological tests become available. Arterial and/or venous thrombosis is a serious complication of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The treatment has two aims: first, to restore arterial patency by clot removal by thrombectomy, bypass or thrombolysis, and second, to avoid new thrombosis formation by substitutive anticoagulation treatment: danaparoid may have cross-reaction with heparin, or lepirudin has anaphylactic risks and needs biological follow-up. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis can be complicated by death or disabilities such as amputations, stroke, renal or bowel infarction. Once HIT has been diagnosed heparin should never be given again, but if cardiopulmonary bypass is required, it might be reintroduced during operation only if serum antibodies have disappeared.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeCase ReportsJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAcute DiseaseAdultAnticoagulantsAorta, AbdominalHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansMaleRenal Artery ObstructionThrombocytopeniaThrombosis

Zusammenfassung

Polytrauma patient developed HIT and acute aortic/renal thrombosis after LMWH; surgical thrombectomy under alternative anticoagulation including lepirudin restored arterial patency.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This case report describes a patient who developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with acute aortic and renal thrombosis while on low-molecular-weight heparin after chest injury, treated with surgical thrombectomy and alternative anticoagulation. The abstract mentions lepirudin as one substitutive anticoagulant option, noting its anaphylactic risks and need for biological follow-up, alongside danaparoid which may have cross-reaction with heparin. While lepirudin is named in the abstract, no description of its origin, mechanism, or connection to leeches or hirudotherapy is provided. No defensible leech link can be drawn from the abstract alone; the article is primarily a surgical case report focused on thrombectomy and heparin discontinuation.

Zitation

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with acute aortic and renal thrombosis in a patient treated with low-molecular-weight heparin.

Chevalier J et al. · European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2005

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.