Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Treating Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Undergoing HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Review published in The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ (2023)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewKlinische StudienEisenberger J et al. · The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ, 2023

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin is the preferred anticoagulant used during open heart surgeries, including left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. In cases in which patients are heparin-induced thrombocytopenia positive (HIT+), the accepted practice has been to substitute heparin with bivalirudin. This practice may be associated with significant bleeding and adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To review our experience with HIT+ patients who were heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis negative (HITT-) and who underwent HeartMate 3 LVAD implantation using heparin intraoperatively rather than bivalirudin. METHODS: From 2016 to 2022, 144 adult patients were implanted with HeartMate 3 LVAD at our center. Among them, 7 were detected as HIT+ but HITT- and therefore were prescribed intraoperatively with heparin and treated pre- and postoperatively with bivalirudin. We reviewed the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics as well as short-term mortality and the complication rates of these HIT+ patients. RESULTS: The median age of our cohort was 56 years (51-60), 71% were male (n=5), all were INTERMACS Level 1, and most were bridged to transplant (n=6, 86%). The 30-day mortality rate post-implantation was 0%. The average 24-hour chest drain postoperative output was 1502.86 ± 931.34 ml. There were no intraoperative pump thromboses, perioperative thromboses, cerebrovascular accidents, or gastrointestinal bleeding within the first 24 hours postoperative. One patient required a revision due to bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative unfractionated heparin may be administered to patients who are HIT+ and HITT- while undergoing LVAD implantation. However, further investigation is required.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeReviewJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedFemaleHeparinHeart-Assist DevicesAnticoagulantsThrombocytopeniaThrombosisHemorrhage

Zusammenfassung

Unfractionated heparin is the preferred anticoagulant used during open heart surgeries, including left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This review examined 7 adult patients who were heparin-induced thrombocytopenia positive but thrombosis negative (HIT+/HITT−) and underwent HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation using intraoperative unfractionated heparin, with bivalirudin administered pre- and postoperatively. Thirty-day mortality was 0%, with no intraoperative or perioperative thromboses, cerebrovascular accidents, or gastrointestinal bleeding within 24 hours; one patient required revision for bleeding. The abstract does not mention hirudin, leech therapy, or the leech secretome, and provides no description of bivalirudin's origin. No defensible connection to hirudotherapy or ASH's domain exists from this abstract; the study concerns perioperative anticoagulation management in a very small, single-center LVAD cohort.

Zitation

Treating Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Undergoing HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Eisenberger J et al. · The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ, 2023

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.