Dabigatran etexilate versus warfarin as the oral anticoagulant of choice? A review of clinical data

For many years, warfarin was the only effective oral anticoagulant to prevent and treat thromboembolism. Nevertheless, its clinical use is limited by a narrow therapeutic window, extensive drug interactions, need of strict dietary control and frequent monitoring. The pharmacological response is also unpredictable and highly variable among patients. Suboptimal anticoagulation can lead to detrimental thromboembolic events or life-threatening bleeding. Direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) activity represents a new class of anticoagulant activity that was intended to replace warfarin. Ximelagatran was the first DTI shown to have similar efficacy to warfarin, but failed to replace it because of a high incidence of liver toxicity. Dabigatran etexilate is another novel DTI with a more predictable pharmacokinetic profile and fewer drug interactions compared with warfarin. Recent large-scaled, randomized studies have shown that it does not share ximelagatran's hepatotoxicity, and is as effective as conventional anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF). These findings led to the approval of dabigatran etexilate for thromboprophylaxis following hip or knee replacement surgery in Europe, Canada and the United Kingdom. Here we summarize the latest evidence concerning the use of dabigatran etexilate in VTE (BISTRO, RE-MODEL, RE-NOVATE, RE-MOBILIZE and RECOVER) and AF (PETRO and RELY). Potential problems related to dabigatran use are also discussed to examine whether it can truly replace warfarin as the gold standard.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Peer-reviewed research on anticoagulant and antithrombotic agents relevant to leech-derived compounds and thrombosis management. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Leech-derived molecules this paper discusses, each with a full profile in the ASH compound registry:

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

More peer-reviewed studies in Arzneimittelentwicklung.

• Novel Leech Antimicrobial Peptides — Hirunipins — Kumar et al. (2025)
• Medicinal Leech Genome Assembly — Anticoagulant Gene Catalog — Kvist et al. (2020)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN PRESBYACUZIS PRAECOX IN CLEAN-UP WORKERS AFTER THE CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT DURING THE POST-CATASTROPHE YEARS — Zabolotnyi D, Mishchanchuk N (2019)
• [Hirudo medicinalis-leech applications in plastic and reconstructive microsurgery--a literature review] — Knobloch K et al. (2007)
• Recombinant hirudin in clinical practice: focus on lepirudin — Greinacher A, Lubenow N (2001)
• In-vitro antileishmanial potential of peptide drug hirudin — Khan H et al. (2017)
• Parenteral anticoagulants: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines — Garcia DA, Baglin TP, Weitz JI, Samama MM (2012)
• Direct thrombin inhibitors — Lee CJ, Ansell JE (2011)
• Updates on Use and Monitoring of Direct Thrombin Inhibitors — Navaei A et al. (2026)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →