Is anticoagulation with bivalirudin comparable to heparin for pediatric extracorporeal life support? Results from a high-volume center
Comparative study published in Artif Organs (2020)
Abstract
There is a paucity of data regarding the use of direct thrombin inhibitors such as bivalirudin for children on extracorporeal life support (ECLS). We sought to compare the outcomes of children on ECLS anticoagulated with bivalirudin versus heparin. Patients transitioned from heparin to bivalirudin were treated as a separate group. A single-institution, retrospective review of all consecutive children (neonate to 18 years) placed on ECLS in the cardiac or pediatric intensive care units was performed (June 2018-December 2019). Data collected included demographics, anticoagulation strategy, number of circuit interventions, blood product use on ECLS, survival to decannulation, and survival to discharge. Fifty-four children were placed on ECLS for a total of 56 runs. Demographics and venovenous versus venoarterial ECLS were similar. The bivalirudin group had longer median duration of support compared to the heparin group--11.0 days [IQR 6.2, 23.1] versus 3.3 days [2.1, 6.2], P < .001. Patients switched from heparin to bivalirudin had a similar duration of support (10.3 days [8.3, 18.3]) as those on bilvalirudin alone. However, there was no difference in red blood cell, fresh frozen plasma, or platelet transfusions. There was no difference in the number of circuit interventions, survival to decannulation or discharge. The freedom to first circuit intervention was longer with bivalirudin compared to heparin. Our data suggest that even with longer pediatric ECLS runs on bivalirudin, there were no differences in the outcomes between the heparin and bivalirudin groups, with longer freedom from first circuit intervention with bivalirudin. While this is the largest reported series comparing children on ECLS anticoagulated with heparin versus bivalirudin, larger studies are needed to determine the optimal anticoagulation strategy for this diverse and complicated group of children.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Largest reported series comparing pediatric ECLS bivalirudin versus heparin showing similar outcomes with longer freedom from first circuit intervention favoring bivalirudin.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese retrospektive Single-Center-Studie verglich die Ergebnisse von 54 Kindern unter extrakorporaler Lebenserhaltung, die entweder mit Bivalirudin, Heparin oder mit einer Umstellung von Heparin auf Bivalirudin antikoaguliert wurden, und erfasste Daten zu Schaltkreis-Interventionen, Blutproduktverbrauch, Überleben bis zur Dekanülierung und Überleben bis zur Entlassung. Die Autoren fanden keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen den Gruppen hinsichtlich Transfusionen, Schaltkreis-Interventionen oder Überleben, obwohl Bivalirudin mit einer längeren Freiheit von der ersten Schaltkreis-Intervention trotz längerer medianer Unterstützungsdauer (11,0 vs. 3,3 Tage, p < 0,001) assoziiert war. Das Abstract beschreibt Bivalirudin als direkten Thrombininhibitor, erwähnt jedoch weder Hirudin noch Blutegel oder eine aus Blutegeln gewonnene Substanz, sodass keine vertretbare Verbindung zur Hirudotherapie besteht. Es handelt sich um eine retrospektive Single-Center-Studie ohne Beteiligung von Blutegeln oder Hirudotherapie, und die Autoren betonen die Notwendigkeit größerer Studien zur Bestimmung der optimalen Antikoagulationsstrategie.
Zitation
Is anticoagulation with bivalirudin comparable to heparin for pediatric extracorporeal life support? Results from a high-volume center.
Schill MR et al. · Artificial organs, 2020
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026