Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Two hour bivalirudin infusion after PCI for ST elevation myocardial infarction

Multicenter prospective registry published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis (2011)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Clinical trialKlinische StudienArzneimittelentwicklungAnderson PR et al. · Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2011

Abstract

The standard of care for STEMI PCI for the past decade has been aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, and a glycoprotein IIbIIIa receptor inhibitor (GPI). A bivalirudin strategy was shown to be superior to a GPI strategy in the HORIZONS AMI trial for net adverse clinical events (combined MACE and bleeding). An increased risk of acute stent thrombosis in the bivalirudin arm may have prevented broader adoption of bivalirudin for this indication. We hypothesized that acute stent thrombosis risk could be ameliorated by a 2 h infusion of bivalirudin following STEMI PCI. We implemented a multicenter, prospective registry for all STEMI patients in Vermont treated at a single PCI center. Each patient was routinely pre-loaded with dual antiplatelet therapy and 75% received an unfractionated heparin bolus prior to PCI. The utilization of bivalirudin bolus and continued 2 h infusion after PCI was routine with GPI bailout optional. 128 consecutive STEMI patients underwent primary PCI from October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009. 92% of primary PCI patients received bivalrudin during and after the procedure with a 9% rate of bail out GPI. There was one case of probable or definite acute stent thrombosis (0.7%), and this single case occurred despite use of bailout GPI. Despite the prolonged infusion of bivalirudin, major bleeding occurred in only 1.7% of STEMI patients. In conclusion, prolonging bivalirudin for 2 h after STEMI PCI may be a promising method to alleviate acute stent thrombosis risk without losing the bleeding complication benefit of the bivalirudin strategy.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeClinical TrialJournal ArticleMulticenter Study
Indexed MeSH termsAgedAntithrombinsCoronary Artery BypassFemaleHirudinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPeptide FragmentsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRecombinant Proteins

Zusammenfassung

Multicenter Vermont registry of 128 STEMI patients showed that a 2-hour bivalirudin infusion after primary PCI reduced acute stent thrombosis to 0.7% (one patient despite bailout GPI), with major bleeding of only 1.7%.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This prospective multicenter registry evaluated a strategy of extending bivalirudin infusion for 2 hours post-PCI in 128 consecutive STEMI patients, aiming to mitigate acute stent thrombosis risk seen in prior trials while preserving bivalirudin's bleeding-safety advantage. Only one case (0.7%) of acute stent thrombosis occurred, and major bleeding was 1.7%. The abstract does not mention hirudin, leeches, or any hirudotherapy connection; no defensible leech link exists based on this abstract. Additionally, this was an uncontrolled observational registry without randomization or a comparator group, limiting the strength of its conclusions.

Zitation

Two hour bivalirudin infusion after PCI for ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Anderson PR et al. · Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2011

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.