Американское общество гирудотерапии

Off-pump coronary artery bypass with bivalirudin for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or antiplatelet factor four/heparin antibodies

Multicenter clinical trial published in Annals of Thoracic Surgery (2007)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Clinical trialКлинические исследованияРазработка лекарственных препаратовDyke CM et al. · Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the use of bivalirudin as an alternative anticoagulant in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-thrombotic syndrome (HIT/TS) or antiplatelet factor four-heparin (anti-PF4/H) antibodies undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). METHODS: In a prospective, open-label, multicenter study, fifty-one patients with documented anti-PF4/H antibodies and (or) HIT/TS underwent OPCAB with bivalirudin anticoagulation (0.75 mg/kg i.v. bolus, 1.75 mg/kg/hour infusion). Procedural success (absence of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke), bleeding, and transfusion at day seven/discharge, thirty days, and twelve weeks were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (67%) were included with positive anti-PF4/H antibodies and no thrombocytopenia or thrombosis, eleven patients (22%) had thrombocytopenia, and five patients had clinical HIT/TS (10%). Procedural success at seven days/discharge was achieved in forty-seven patients (92%), while procedural success at thirty days and twelve weeks was 88%. There were no deaths. Chest tube output over the first twenty-four hours was 936 +/- 525 mL and twenty-five patients received a red blood cell transfusion during their hospitalization. Two patients required reexploration for persistent postoperative hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin was an effective alternative anticoagulant for patients with HIT/TS or circulating anti-PF4/H antibodies undergoing OPCAB, with high rates of procedural success and an acceptable incidence of bleeding or transfusions.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeClinical TrialJournal ArticleMulticenter Study
Indexed MeSH termsAgedAntibodiesAnticoagulantsCoronary Artery Bypass, Off-PumpFemaleHeparinHirudinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsPlatelet Factor 4

Резюме

Prospective multicenter trial of bivalirudin (0.75 mg/kg bolus + 1.75 mg/kg/h) in 51 OPCAB patients with HIT/TS or anti-PF4/heparin antibodies: procedural success 92% at 7 days/discharge, 88% at 12 weeks, with no deaths.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This prospective, open-label, multicenter study evaluated bivalirudin as an alternative anticoagulant in 51 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or anti-PF4/heparin antibodies undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). Bivalirudin anticoagulation (0.75 mg/kg bolus, 1.75 mg/kg/hour infusion) achieved procedural success in 92% at day seven/discharge and 88% at twelve weeks, with no deaths. Bleeding outcomes included mean 24-hour chest tube output of 936 ± 525 mL, red blood cell transfusion in 25 patients, and reexploration for hemorrhage in 2 patients. For ASH, the abstract contains no mention of leeches, hirudotherapy, or the leech secretome. The study concerns cardiac surgery pharmacology with a pharmaceutical agent, and no defensible connection to leech-based therapeutics can be drawn from this abstract.

Цитирование

Off-pump coronary artery bypass with bivalirudin for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or antiplatelet factor four/heparin antibodies.

Dyke CM et al. · Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.