Американское общество гирудотерапии

Anticoagulation for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia before, during, and after peripheral endovascular procedures

Review published in Vasa (2025)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewРазработка лекарственных препаратовБезопасность и инфекционный контрольCardi S et al. · VASA, 2025

Abstract

Acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II requires the immediate discontinuation of heparin and initiation of a non-heparin anticoagulant. Lifelong avoidance of heparin is generally recommended due to the risk of recurrence. Therefore, anticoagulation management in endovascular procedures remains challenging, as heparin is the preferred anticoagulant and evidence on alternative strategies is limited. This narrative review outlines an institutional approach aligned with current guidelines and examines the available data on non-heparin anticoagulants in this setting. Current evidence may support the use of bivalirudin among non-heparin anticoagulants for peripheral endovascular interventions due to indirect evidence of its use during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute HIT. However, bivalirudin is often not available due to drug shortage and not approved for HIT in Europe. This leaves argatroban as the main alternative, particularly in patients with renal impairment. Data on non-heparin anticoagulation for HIT were extrapolated from other types of intervention and from small retrospective studies. In selected cases of patients with remote or subacute HIT B and negative antibodies, intraoperative heparin may be considered if alternative anticoagulants are not practical, particularly in emergency situations, even in this approach is controversial and not discussed in current guidelines regarding peripheral endovascular procedures. In the absence of robust evidence, anticoagulation strategies should be individualized and patients adequately informed. Further studies are necessary to optimize anticoagulant management among patients with HIT undergoing peripheral endovascular interventions.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsHumansMaleFemaleThrombocytopeniaHeparinAnticoagulantsEndovascular ProceduresPeripheral Vascular DiseasesTreatment OutcomeBlood CoagulationRisk FactorsPeptide Fragments

Резюме

Narrative review and institutional algorithm for non-heparin anticoagulation during peripheral endovascular procedures in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, with focus on bivalirudin and argatroban.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This review outlined an institutional approach to anticoagulation management for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing peripheral endovascular procedures, examining non-heparin alternatives including bivalirudin and argatroban. The abstract notes that bivalirudin received indirect support from PCI literature but faces availability limitations and lacks HIT approval in Europe, leaving argatroban as the main alternative, particularly in renal impairment. The abstract does not mention hirudin, leeches, or leech therapy, and no defensible connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome can be drawn from this article. This review is not relevant to ASH's domain.

Цитирование

Anticoagulation for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia before, during, and after peripheral endovascular procedures.

Cardi S et al. · VASA, 2025

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.