Association Between Argatroban and Outcomes of Branch Atheromatous Disease: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From MRI-Based Study
Research article published in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics (2025)
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Argatroban is widely used for patients with acute branch atheromatous disease (BAD)-related stroke, but its efficacy remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate its clinical outcomes in this patient population. METHODS: A prospective, MRI-based cohort (BAD-study) was conducted across 20 hospitals in China from June 2021 to June 2023, enrolling patients aged 18-80 years with BAD-related stroke within 72 h of onset. Patients were divided into two groups: Argatroban and non-argatroban. The primary outcome was an excellent outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included good outcome (mRS 0-2), mRS score, Barthel Index score at 90 days, and NIHSS score at 7 days. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between argatroban and outcomes after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 467 patients were included, with a median age of 60 years and a median NIHSS score of 4 at admission. Eighty-six patients (18.4%) were in the argatroban group, and 381 patients (81.6%) were in the non-argatroban group. After PSM, excellent outcomes occurred in 60.0% of the argatroban group and 64.2% of the non-argatroban group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.47-1.49, p = 0.542). Argatroban was not significantly associated with secondary outcomes and remained ineffective in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Argatroban was not associated with excellent outcome at 90 days in patients with acute BAD-related stroke. Our study suggests that the risks and benefits of argatroban need reevaluation in patients with BAD-related stroke.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Peer-reviewed pharmacology and drug-development research relevant to anticoagulants and leech-derived compounds. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
En esta cohorte prospectiva, basada en resonancia magnética (MRI), multicéntrica de 467 pacientes con ictus relacionado con enfermedad ateromatosa ramificada aguda (BAD), el argatroban (un inhibidor directo de la trombina) no se asoció con un resultado excelente a los 90 días tras el emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión (60.0% vs 64.2%; OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.47-1.49, p=0.542) y no mostró beneficio en los resultados secundarios, lo que llevó a los autores a solicitar una reevaluación de su balance riesgo-beneficio en este grupo. La relevancia de la hirudoterapia es indirecta, a través de la línea del secretoma: el argatroban pertenece a la clase de inhibidores directos de la trombina para la cual la hirudina derivada de la lombriz fue el prototipo natural, por lo que esto es una recordatoria sobria de que los anticoagulantes inhibidores de la trombina no benefician a toda indicación. El estudio es observacional (no aleatorizado) y prueba un fármaco sintético en un subtipo específico de ictus, no terapia con lombriz ni hirudina nativa.
Citación
Association Between Argatroban and Outcomes of Branch Atheromatous Disease: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From MRI-Based Study.
Li et al. · CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 29, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026