Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in pediatric congenital and acquired heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Research article published in Thrombosis journal (2026)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewSeguridad y control de infeccionesBakry et al. · Thrombosis journal, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with congenital and acquired heart disease (CAHD) are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Traditional anticoagulants such as vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) present challenges in pediatrics due to burdensome administration, frequent monitoring, and adherence issues. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have transformed adult anticoagulation, but their role in pediatric CAHD remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with standard-of-care (SOC) anticoagulation in pediatric patients with CAHD. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase through July 1, 2025. Eligible studies included RCTs comparing DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) with VKAs, LMWH, or aspirin in patients < 18 years with CAHD. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed for children with congenital heart disease (CHD). RESULTS: Four RCTs, including 732 patients, were analyzed. In the overall population (patients with congenital and acquired heart disease), DOACs significantly reduced thromboembolic events compared to standard-of-care anticoagulation (RR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.18–0.97; p = 0.04). In the prespecified congenital heart disease (CHD) subgroup, a trend toward reduced events was observed but did not reach statistical significance (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.06–1.29). Individual thromboembolic outcomes (stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and intracardiac thrombus) were rare, with no significant differences between DOAC and control groups in either the overall population or the CHD subgroup (all p > 0.05). Regarding safety, major bleeding rates were similar between DOAC and control groups in the overall population (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.25–3.35) and the CHD subgroup (RR = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.06–32.65). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding was also comparable between DOAC and control groups overall (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.23–1.68) and in the CHD subgroup (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.19–2.49). CONCLUSIONS: DOACs seem to be effective and safe for thromboprophylaxis in pediatric patients with CAHD. They reduce the risk of thromboembolism without increasing bleeding complications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-026-00850-z.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview

Resumen

Peer-reviewed research on safety and infection-control considerations relevant to leech therapy and anticoagulation. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Esta revisión sistemática y metaanálisis agrupó cuatro ensayos controlados aleatorizados (732 niños con cardiopatía congénita o adquirida) y encontró que los anticoagulantes orales directos (DOACs) redujeron significativamente los eventos tromboembólicos frente a la anticoagulación estándar (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.97; p=0.04) sin aumentar el sangrado mayor o el sangrado no mayor clínicamente relevante. En cuanto al panorama de la evidencia sobre la hirudoterapia, este estudio mapea el panorama contemporáneo de la anticoagulación farmacológica contra el cual se compara cualquier antitrombina derivada de sanguijuelas (hirudin y sus análogos), subrayando que el desafío central del campo sigue siendo equilibrar la eficacia antitrombótica frente al riesgo de sangrado. Advertencia: esto concierne a los anticoagulantes orales de moléculas pequeñas, no a la terapia con sanguijuelas ni a su secretoma; el número de ensayos agrupados es pequeño, el subgrupo de cardiopatía congénita no alcanzó significancia estadística, y los hallazgos no tienen relación directa con el uso de sanguijuelas, el cual está establecido para la congestión venosa en colgajos y reimplantación más que para la tromboprofilaxis sistémica.

Citación

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in pediatric congenital and acquired heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Bakry et al. · Thrombosis journal, 2026

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.