Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban, and Rivaroxaban Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation : A Multinational Population-Based Cohort Study
Research article published in Annals of internal medicine (2022)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but head-to-head trial data do not exist to guide the choice of DOAC. OBJECTIVE: To do a large-scale comparison between all DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) in routine clinical practice. DESIGN: Multinational population-based cohort study. SETTING: Five standardized electronic health care databases, which covered 221 million people in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were newly diagnosed with AF from 2010 through 2019 and received a new DOAC prescription. MEASUREMENTS: Database-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and all-cause mortality between DOACs were estimated using a Cox regression model stratified by propensity score and pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 527 226 new DOAC users met the inclusion criteria (apixaban, n = 281 320; dabigatran, n = 61 008; edoxaban, n = 12 722; and rivaroxaban, n = 172 176). Apixaban use was associated with lower risk for GIB than use of dabigatran (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70 to 0.94]), edoxaban (HR, 0.77 [CI, 0.66 to 0.91]), or rivaroxaban (HR, 0.72 [CI, 0.66 to 0.79]). No substantial differences were observed for other outcomes or DOAC-DOAC comparisons. The results were consistent for patients aged 80 years or older. Consistent associations between lower GIB risk and apixaban versus rivaroxaban were observed among patients receiving the standard dose (HR, 0.72 [CI, 0.64 to 0.82]), those receiving a reduced dose (HR, 0.68 [CI, 0.61 to 0.77]), and those with chronic kidney disease (HR, 0.68 [CI, 0.59 to 0.77]). LIMITATION: Residual confounding is possible. CONCLUSION: Among patients with AF, apixaban use was associated with lower risk for GIB and similar rates of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, ICH, and all-cause mortality compared with dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. This finding was consistent for patients aged 80 years or older and those with chronic kidney disease, who are often underrepresented in clinical trials. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este estudio de cohorte multinacional basado en la población (cinco bases de datos electrónicas de atención médica estandarizadas que cubren a 221 millones de personas en Francia, Alemania, el Reino Unido y los EE. UU.; 527,226 nuevos usuarios de anticoagulantes orales directos recién diagnosticados con fibrilación auricular 2010–2019) comparó apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban y rivaroxaban, encontrando que apixaban se asoció con un menor riesgo de sangrado gastrointestinal y ninguna diferencia sustancial en accidente cerebrovascular isquémico/embolia sistémica, hemorragia intracraneal o mortalidad por todas las causas frente a los otros DOAC, con resultados consistentes en pacientes de 80+ años y aquellos con enfermedad renal crónica. Para la hirudoterapia, este es un contexto de fondo sobre el panorama moderno de los anticoagulantes en lugar de un estudio sobre sanguijuelas: los DOAC examinados son agentes sintéticos, no moléculas derivadas de Hirudo, pero los datos informan cómo se sopesa la anticoagulación sistémica frente al riesgo de sangrado — la misma lógica de riesgo-beneficio que rige las decisiones para favorecer la descongestión localizada inducida por sanguijuelas en un colgajo congestionado sobre la escalada de la anticoagulación sistémica. Advertencia: esta es evidencia de cohorte observacional (el resumen señala que no existen datos de ensayos aleatorizados comparativos directos de DOAC), por lo que es posible la confusión residual y las asociaciones no deben interpretarse como prueba de causalidad.
Citación
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban, and Rivaroxaban Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation : A Multinational Population-Based Cohort Study.
Lau et al. · Annals of internal medicine, 2022
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026