Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Oral Anticoagulation.

Review published in Deutsches Arzteblatt international (2018)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewEnsayos clínicosDesarrollo de fármacosAltiok et al. · Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Much new evidence on oral anticoagulation has come to light in recent years. Non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anti- coagulants (NOAC) have been developed and have been introduced into clinical practice. In this review, we present the current state of the evidence on anticoagulation for various indications with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and with NOAC. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective search in PubMed (search terms: anticoagulation, atrial fibrillation, prosthetic valve, thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) and on specialty society recommendations and relevant guidelines from the years 2000-2018. RESULTS: The main indications for oral anticoagulation are atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and status post heart valve replacement. In patients with atrial fibrillation and without valvular heart disease, anticoagulation is recommended for men with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 and for women with a score ≥ 2. NOAC for this indication are associated with a marginally lower rate of stroke than VKA (3.5% vs. 3.8%, number needed to treat [NNT] = 333) as well as a lower rate of major hemorrhage (5.1% vs. 6.2%, NNT = 91). NOAC are contraindicated for patients with mechanical heart valves. Anticoagulation with VKA can be predictably antagonized. Among the various types of NOAC, the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran can be safely antagonized with an antidote; no specific antidote is yet available for apixaban, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban. CONCLUSION: The evidence base for anticoagulation over a time frame of several years is inadequate at present, and direct comparative data for the different types of NOAC are not yet available.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansRisk AssessmentVenous ThromboembolismVitamin K

Resumen

Much new evidence on oral anticoagulation has come to light in recent years. Non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anti- coagulants (NOAC) have been developed and have been introduced into clinical practice.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This review evaluated the current state of evidence for oral anticoagulation, specifically comparing vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-vitamin-K-dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs) across various cardiovascular indications. For the American Society of Hirudotherapy, this article provides important background on systemic anticoagulant therapies, which conceptually parallel the potent localized anticoagulant effects of leech salivary components like hirudin. Reviewing the bleeding risks and therapeutic mechanisms of standard oral anticoagulants helps define the clinical landscape in which leech-derived therapies might be understood or contrasted. However, the abstract focuses exclusively on conventional pharmacology and does not mention leeches, hirudotherapy, or the leech secretome, representing only indirect thematic relevance.

Citación

Oral Anticoagulation.

Altiok et al. · Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.