Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Characterization of currently marketed heparin products: key tests for LMWH quality assurance

Research article published in Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis (2013)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportArzneimittelentwicklungYe H et al. · Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2013

Abstract

During the 2007-2008 heparin crisis it was found that the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) testing monograph for heparin sodium or low molecular weight heparins did not detect the presence of the contaminant, oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS). In response to this concern, new tests and specifications were developed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and USP and put in place to detect not only the contaminant OSCS, but also to improve assurance of quality and purity of these drug products. The USP monographs for the low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) approved for use in the United States (dalteparin, tinzaparin and enoxaparin) are also undergoing revision to include many of the same tests used for heparin sodium, including; one-dimensional (1D) 500 MHz (1)H NMR, SAX-HPLC, percent galactosamine in total hexosamine and anticoagulation time assays with purified Factor IIa or Factor Xa. These tests represent orthogonal approaches for heparin identification, measurement of bioactivity and for detection of process impurities or contaminants in these drug products. Here we describe results from a survey of multiple lots from three types of LMWHs in the US market which were collected after the 2009 heparin sodium monograph revision. In addition, innovator and generic versions of formulated enoxaparin products purchased in 2011 are compared using these tests and found to be highly similar within the discriminating power of the assays applied.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Indexed MeSH termsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDrug ContaminationElectrophoresis, CapillaryEnoxaparinHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Zusammenfassung

During the 2007-2008 heparin crisis it was found that the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) testing monograph for heparin sodium or low molecular weight heparins did not detect the presence of the contaminant, oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS).

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This study describes the application of orthogonal analytical tests, including NMR and HPLC, to characterize currently marketed low molecular weight heparins and detect the presence of contaminants like oversulfated chondroitin sulfate following the 2007-2008 heparin crisis. The research is fundamentally centered on pharmaceutical quality assurance and ensuring the purity of anticoagulant drug products. This article does not involve leeches, hirudotherapy, or any components of the leech secretome. Consequently, its relevance to the American Society of Hirudotherapy is strictly indirect, touching only upon the safety surveillance of conventional anticoagulant drugs.

Zitation

Characterization of currently marketed heparin products: key tests for LMWH quality assurance

Ye H et al. · Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2013

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.