Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Randomized controlled trial published in The New England journal of medicine (2010)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is no evidence from randomized trials to support a strategy of lowering systolic blood pressure below 135 to 140 mm Hg in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We investigated whether therapy targeting normal systolic pressure (i.e., <120 mm Hg) reduces major cardiovascular events in participants with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events. METHODS: A total of 4733 participants with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to intensive therapy, targeting a systolic pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, or standard therapy, targeting a systolic pressure of less than 140 mm Hg. The primary composite outcome was nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes. The mean follow-up was 4.7 years. RESULTS: After 1 year, the mean systolic blood pressure was 119.3 mm Hg in the intensive-therapy group and 133.5 mm Hg in the standard-therapy group. The annual rate of the primary outcome was 1.87% in the intensive-therapy group and 2.09% in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio with intensive therapy, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.06; P=0.20). The annual rates of death from any cause were 1.28% and 1.19% in the two groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.35; P=0.55). The annual rates of stroke, a prespecified secondary outcome, were 0.32% and 0.53% in the two groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89; P=0.01). Serious adverse events attributed to antihypertensive treatment occurred in 77 of the 2362 participants in the intensive-therapy group (3.3%) and 30 of the 2371 participants in the standard-therapy group (1.3%) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events, targeting a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, as compared with less than 140 mm Hg, did not reduce the rate of a composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000620.)
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
There is no evidence from randomized trials to support a strategy of lowering systolic blood pressure below 135 to 140 mm Hg in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese randomisierte Studie wies 4.733 Hochrisikopatienten mit Typ-2-Diabetes über 4,7 Jahre einer intensiven (systolisch <120 mmHg) versus Standard-Blutdrucktherapie (systolisch <140 mmHg) zu. Die intensive Therapie reduzierte den primären zusammengesetzten kardiovaskulären Endpunkt nicht signifikant (HR 0,88, P=0,20), erhöhte jedoch schwerwiegende unerwünschte Ereignisse, die der antihypertensiven Behandlung zugeschrieben wurden (3,3 % vs. 1,3 %, P<0,001), bei einer sekundären Reduktion der Schlaganfallrate. Dieser Artikel betrifft die antihypertensive Strategie bei Diabetikern. Es besteht keinerlei Bezug zu Blutegeln, Hirudotherapie oder dem Blutegelsekretom, und es existiert keine vertretbare Relevanz für das Fachgebiet der ASH.
Zitation
Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus
et al. · The New England journal of medicine, 2010
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026