Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

The tissue factor pathway in disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Review published in Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis (2001)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewArzneimittelentwicklungSpeichel-PharmakologieØsterud et al. · Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis, 2001

Abstract

In most instances, tissue factor (TF) exposed to the circulation is the sole culprit underlying the initiation of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), although notable exceptions because of a more direct activation of the coagulation system, by snake venoms, for example, do occur. Peripheral monocytes and subendothelial structures are the potential sources of such TF; in the former, TF emerges on the cell surface on synthesis induction and in the latter it becomes available subsequent to permeability changes or damage to the endothelium. Subendothelial TF is constitutively present in fibroblasts, pericytes, and macrophages and at a higher than normal level in tumor-associated macrophages. This scenario of coagulation activation probably describes the principal events underlying emerging acute DIC states under pathophysiological conditions such as abruptio placentae, septic abortion, amniotic fluid embolization, and pregnancy toxemia. Under disease conditions associated with DIC, the continuous exposure to excess TF typically exhausts the available tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), leading to rampant thrombin generation, persistent feedback activation of factor XI (FXI) by the generated thrombin, and hence virtually uncheckable ongoing fibrin generation (DIC). Recently, it was shown that patients subject to meningococcal sepsis had comparatively large amounts of mainly monocyte-derived circulating TF-containing microparticles. Because phosphatidylserine (PS) is exposed on such particles, in addition to TF, they probably contribute crucially to DIC during meningococcal sepsis. Although endothelial cells (EC) have been shown to express large amounts of TF in vitro, this observation hardly relates to the situation in vivo, where, in contrast, synthesis and exposure of EC TF is very limited and not likely to be of any significance in emerging and ongoing DIC.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAnimalsBlood CoagulationDisseminated Intravascular CoagulationFemaleHumansPregnancySignal TransductionThromboplastin

Zusammenfassung

In most instances, tissue factor (TF) exposed to the circulation is the sole culprit underlying the initiation of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), although notable exceptions because of a more direct activation of the coagulation system, by snake venoms, for example, do occur....

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This review examines the role of tissue factor (TF) in the initiation and propagation of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), highlighting how excess TF exhausts available tissue factor pathway inhibitor. It explores how peripheral monocytes and subendothelial structures expose TF to the circulation under various pathophysiological conditions, such as abruptio placentae, amniotic fluid embolization, and meningococcal sepsis. While a deep understanding of coagulation cascades and thrombotic disease is foundational to pharmacological anticoagulation, this article has no direct relevance to hirudotherapy. It focuses entirely on endogenous human coagulopathy without any mention of leeches, hirudin, or leech-derived therapies.

Zitation

The tissue factor pathway in disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Østerud et al. · Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis, 2001

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.