Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Heparin Resistance in Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Evidence-Based Management.

Review published in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2025)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewArzneimittelentwicklungSpeichel-PharmakologieRivera Jiménez et al. · Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025

Abstract

Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the standard anticoagulant during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A clinically relevant subset develops heparin resistance (HR)-failure to reach adequate anticoagulation with usual UFH-raising thrombotic risk and complicating perioperative care. Objectives: To synthesize contemporary evidence on the mechanisms, clinical implications, and perioperative management of HR in adult cardiac surgery with CPB. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on the epidemiology, mechanisms, recognition, and management of HR in adult cardiac surgery with CPB, emphasizing clinically actionable points. Results: Incidence varies across centers and definitions. Mechanisms include antithrombin (AT) deficiency or consumption and AT-independent drivers such as systemic inflammation or sepsis, protein-loss states, thrombocytosis, hyperfibrinogenemia, obesity, prior heparin exposure, and drug interactions. Sole reliance on activated clotting time (ACT) may misestimate anticoagulant effect; anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) assays or heparin titration systems improve assessment when available. Management is stepwise: UFH dose escalation; targeted AT supplementation (or fresh frozen plasma where concentrates are unavailable); and transition to direct thrombin inhibitors when HR persists or UFH is contraindicated. Protocolized pathways and multidisciplinary coordination reduce delays and adverse events. Conclusions: HR is a multifactorial, common challenge in CPB. Pre-bypass risk assessment, multimodal monitoring, and an algorithm prioritizing UFH optimization, AT repletion, and timely use of direct thrombin inhibitors provide a pragmatic framework to limit thrombosis and bleeding. Harmonized definitions and comparative trials remain priorities.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsHumansAnticoagulantsAntithrombinsBlood CoagulationBlood Coagulation TestsCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiopulmonary BypassDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsDrug ResistanceFactor Xa InhibitorsHeparin

Zusammenfassung

: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the standard anticoagulant during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A clinically relevant subset develops heparin resistance (HR)-failure to reach adequate anticoagulation with usual UFH-raising thrombotic risk and complicating perioperative care.: To synthesize...

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This narrative review synthesizes evidence on heparin resistance during adult cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, discussing mechanisms such as antithrombin deficiency/consumption and antithrombin-independent drivers, monitoring with activated clotting time and anti-factor Xa assays, and stepwise management using unfractionated heparin escalation, antithrombin supplementation, and direct thrombin inhibitors when heparin resistance persists or UFH is contraindicated. The abstract is relevant to perioperative anticoagulation management and coagulation care. It identifies only the drug class of direct thrombin inhibitors and does not name hirudin, leech-derived agents, or hirudotherapy. Accordingly, the article provides no direct evidence for leech therapy or the leech secretome, and no leech-specific relevance can be inferred.

Zitation

Heparin Resistance in Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Evidence-Based Management.

Rivera Jiménez et al. · Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.