Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study of Bivalirudin Compared to Unfractionated Heparin in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a form of temporary mechanical circulatory support, causes a prothrombotic state due to activation of inflammatory processes via exposure of blood to the circuit. Systemic anticoagulation is recommended to prevent thrombosis. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are anticoagulant agents that inactivate thrombin; however, UFH requires antithrombin III (ATIII) for its activity, and patients supported by ECMO are at risk for acquired ATIII deficiency. In addition, heparin may cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, complicating therapy. Guidelines on anticoagulant use in ECMO reference UFH as a recommended agent with DTIs as an alternative option. Meta-analyses comparing the 2 agents in ECMO have evaluated efficacy and safety; however, discordant results prompt the need for additional research. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate differences in bleeding and thrombotic events between UFH and bivalirudin for anticoagulation during ECMO support. METHODS: This study is a retrospective, single-center cohort study conducted at a primary ECMO center and a tertiary academic medical center. RESULTS: Bleeding and systemic thrombosis rates were not different between bivalirudin and UFH (30 vs 33 events, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55-1.47, P = 0.7; 12 vs 17 events, HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.32-1.42, P = 0.3); however, when controlled for covariates, device thrombosis was lower with bivalirudin (30.2% vs 43.4%, P = 0.017). Time in therapeutic range (TTR) was higher with bivalirudin (69.98% vs 55.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: When compared to heparin, bivalirudin for anticoagulation in ECMO was associated with a decreased rate of device thrombosis and greater TTR.

Abstract aus PubMed (NCBI) für den zitierten Eintrag, in der Originalsprache wiedergegeben. Maßgeblich ist die Fassung der Originalpublikation.

Das Abstract wird nicht übersetzt, damit die eigene Wortwahl der Autoren erhalten bleibt.

Retrospective single-center cohort of ECMO patients comparing bivalirudin with unfractionated heparin: bleeding and systemic thrombosis rates were similar, but bivalirudin was associated with lower device thrombosis and more time in therapeutic range.

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Weitere begutachtete Studien in der Kategorie „Arzneimittelentwicklung“.

• Hirudotherapie in Medizin und Zahnmedizin — Jha K et al. (2015)
• Blutegeltherapie: eine Geschichte — Hyson J (2005)
• Hirudine der asiatischen medizinischen Blutegelart Hirudinaria manillensis: gleich und doch verschieden — Lukas P et al. (2019)
• Transcriptomic analysis of the salivary gland of medicinal leech Hirudo nipponia — Lu Z et al. (2018)
• Molekulardynamische und pharmakologische Untersuchungen an durch Protein-Engineering erzeugten Hirudin-Varianten von Hirudinaria manillensis und Hirudo medicinalis — Sun Y et al. (2022)
• Zellfreie Synthese der Hirudin-Variante 1 des blutsaugenden Egels Hirudo medicinalis — Wüstenhagen D et al. (2020)
• Produktion von Hirudin-Varianten durch gentechnisch veränderte mikrobielle Zellfabriken — Zhang J, Lan N (2018)
• Hirudin bei heparininduzierter Thrombozytopenie — Lubenow N, Greinacher A (2002)
• Hirudin verbessert die diabetische Nephropathie durch Hemmung der Gsdmd-vermittelten Pyroptose — Han J et al. (2023)
• Hirudin als alternatives Antikoagulans – eine historische Übersicht — Markwardt F (2002)

Alle von der ASH analysierten Studien →