Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

A randomized evaluation of simulation training on performance of vascular anastomosis on a high-fidelity in vivo model: the role of deliberate practice.

Research article published in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2011)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: 18. Juni 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Forschungsartikel – EvidenzreviewArtikelreferenz
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialKlinische StudienPrice et al. · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2011

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is mounting evidence supporting the benefit of surgical skills practice in a simulated environment. However, the use of simulation in cardiac surgical training has been limited. The purpose of the current trial was to examine the effect of independent and deliberate simulator practice, during nonclinical time, on the performance of an end-to-side microvascular anastomosis in an in vivo model. METHODS: This single-blinded, randomized controlled trial received institutional review board approval. Thirty-nine first- and second-year surgical trainees were randomized to an expert-guided tutorial on a procedural trainer or to the expert-guided tutorial combined with self-directed practice on the same procedural trainer. Self-directed practice consisted of 10 anastomoses performed on the procedural trainer: a low-fidelity, commercially available bench model using 4-mm polytetrafluoroethylene graft as simulated blood vessel. Two weeks after the tutorial, subjects performed an end-to-side anastomosis in a live porcine model, under realistic operating room conditions. Assessment of outcomes was performed by 2 blinded, expert observers, uings validated measurements of technical skill. The primary outcome was the score on the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scale. Secondary outcomes included an anastomosis-specific end-product evaluation and time to completion. Statistical analysis was conducted using nonparametric, univariate techniques. RESULTS: Compared with residents who received expert-guided simulator training alone, those who in addition practiced on a simulator independently after hours scored significantly higher on the OSATS scale (23.7 ± 4.7 vs 18.5 ± 3.9, P = .003). Residents who practiced independently also scored significantly higher on the end-product evaluation (11.4 ± 3.2 vs 8.9 ± 2.1, P = .02) and performed the anastomosis significantly faster (777 seconds vs 977 seconds, P = .04). Interrater reliability was high between the expert observers (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Residents who had the opportunity for self-directed simulator practice performed an end-to-side anastomosis more adeptly, more quickly, and with a higher quality end product. The results of this randomized trial suggest that independent training on a procedural trainer did transfer to improved performance in an operating room environment. Simulator training should be incorporated into cardiovascular surgical curricula and residents should have access to this modality for independent after-hours practice to improve operating room performance.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAnastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsClinical CompetenceHumansMicrosurgeryModels, AnimalSingle-Blind MethodSwineVascular Surgical Procedures

Zusammenfassung

A randomized evaluation of simulation training on performance of vascular anastomosis on a high-fidelity in vivo model: the role of deliberate practice.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

Diese randomisierte kontrollierte Studie untersuchte den Effekt von unabhängigem, gezieltem Simulator-Training auf die Durchführung einer mikrochirurgischen End-zu-Seit-Anastomose in einem lebenden Schweinemodell bei 39 chirurgischen Assistenzärzten im ersten und zweiten Ausbildungsjahr. Die Studie ergab, dass Assistenzärzte, die ein expertengeführtes Tutorial mit selbstgesteuertem Simulator-Training kombinierten, auf der Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill-Skala signifikant höher bewertet wurden (23,7 vs. 18,5, P=0,003), bei der Endprodukt-Bewertung (11,4 vs. 8,9, P=0,02) sowie schneller arbeiteten (777 vs. 977 Sekunden, P=0,04) im Vergleich zu denen, die nur das Tutorial erhielten. Das Abstract behandelt chirurgisches Simulationstraining und den Transfer von Fertigkeiten in den Operationssaal. Es enthält keine Erwähnung von Blutegeln, Hirudotherapie, dem Management venöser Kongestion oder dem Blutegel-Sekretom, sodass seine Relevanz für die American Society of Hirudotherapy nicht gegeben ist.

Zitation

A randomized evaluation of simulation training on performance of vascular anastomosis on a high-fidelity in vivo model: the role of deliberate practice.

Price et al. · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2011

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Freigabe für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.