Usefulness of Clopidogrel Loading in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the BRAVO-3 Randomized Trial)
Randomized controlled trial published in The American journal of cardiology (2019)
Abstract
P2Y12-inhibitor initiation with clopidogrel using a loading dose (LD) versus no LD (NLD) provides more rapid inhibition of platelet activation and reduced risk of ischemic events after coronary stenting. Whether a similar beneficial effect is achieved in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unknown. We evaluate the effects of preprocedural clopidogrel LD versus no NLD on 48-hour and 30-day clinical outcomes after TAVI. In the BRAVO-3 trial, 802 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transfemoral TAVI were randomized to intraprocedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin. Administration of clopidogrel LD was left to the discretion of the treating physician. For this analysis, patients were stratified according to receiving clopidogrel LD (n = 294, 36.6%) or NLD (n = 508, 63.4%) before TAVI. LD patients more often received a self-expandable prosthesis using larger sheaths. P2Y12-inhibitor maintenance therapy pre-TAVI was similar in patients with LD versus NLD (28.2% vs 33.1%, p = 0.16). LD versus NLD was associated with similar incidences of major adverse cardiovascular events (i e., death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) (4.1% vs 4.1%, p = 0.97) and major bleeding (8.5% vs 7.7%, p = 0.68), but a higher rate of major vascular complications (11.9% vs 7.1%, p = 0.02). Multivariable adjustment showed that clopidogrel LD did not affect any of the studied clinical events, including major vascular complications (odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.39, p = 0.67). Also patients on clopidogrel maintenance therapy and thus considered in steady state were not at reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with patients not on clopidogrel (3.7% vs 5.2%, p = 0.36). In conclusion, in patients who underwent TAVI, use of clopidogrel LD was associated with higher vascular complications and otherwise similar clinical events compared to NLD patients.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
P2Y-inhibitor initiation with clopidogrel using a loading dose (LD) versus no LD (NLD) provides more rapid inhibition of platelet activation and reduced risk of ischemic events after coronary stenting.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese klinische Studie untersuchte die Wirkungen einer Clopidogrel-Aufsättigungsdosis im Vergleich zu keiner Aufsättigungsdosis auf klinische Ergebnisse nach 48 Stunden und 30 Tagen bei Patienten, die sich einer transkatheter-gestützten Aortenklappenimplantation (TAVI) unterzogen. Diese Studie hat keine direkte Relevanz für die American Society of Hirudotherapy, da sie sich ausschließlich auf Antiplättchen- und Antikoagulationsstrategien in der interventionellen Kardiologie konzentriert, ohne Blutegel, Blutegelextrakte oder das Blutegelsekretom einzubeziehen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen lediglich, dass Clopidogrel-Aufsättigungsdosen mit höheren vaskulären Komplikationen und ansonsten vergleichbaren klinischen Ereignissen im Vergleich zu keiner Aufsättigungsdosis assoziiert waren. Daher liefert dieser Artikel keine aussagekräftigen Daten für das Gebiet der Hirudotherapie.
Zitation
Usefulness of Clopidogrel Loading in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the BRAVO-3 Randomized Trial)
Nijenhuis VJ et al. · The American journal of cardiology, 2019
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026