Differences between human proteinase 3 and neutrophil elastase and their murine homologues are relevant for murine model experiments

Direct comparisons of human (h) and murine (m) neutrophil elastase (NE) and proteinase 3 (PR3) are important for the understanding and interpretation of inflammatory and PR3-related autoimmune processes investigated in wild-type-, mNE- and mPR3/mNE knockout mice. To this end, we purified recombinant mPR3 and mNE expressed in HMC1 and 293 cells and compared their biophysical properties, proteolytic activities and susceptibility to inhibitors with those of their human homologues, hPR3 and hNE. Significant species differences in physico-chemical properties, substrate specificities and enzyme kinetics towards synthetic peptide substrates, oxidized insulin B chain, and fibrinogen were detected. MeOSuc-AAPV-pNA and Suc-AAPV-pNA were hydrolyzed more efficiently by mPR3 than hPR3, but enzymatic activities of mNE and hNE were very similar. Fibrinogen was cleaved much more efficiently by mPR3 than by hPR3. All four proteases were inhibited by alpha(1)-antitrypsin and elafin. Eglin C inihibited mNE, hNE, mPR3, but not hPR3. SLPI inhibited both NEs, but neither PR3. The custom-designed hNE inhibitor, Val(15)-aprotinin, is a poor inhibitor for mNE. In conclusion, appropriate interpretation of experiments in murine models requires individual species-specific assessment of neutrophil protease function and inhibition.

Abstract aus PubMed (NCBI) für den zitierten Eintrag, in der Originalsprache wiedergegeben. Maßgeblich ist die Fassung der Originalpublikation.

Das Abstract wird nicht übersetzt, damit die eigene Wortwahl der Autoren erhalten bleibt.

Comparing purified recombinant proteins, eglin C inhibited murine and human neutrophil elastase and murine PR3, but not human PR3, and the species also differed in substrate specificity and enzyme kinetics, so murine neutrophil-protease findings should not be extrapolated to humans without species-specific validation.

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Weitere begutachtete Studien in der Kategorie „Arzneimittelentwicklung“.

• Novel Leech Antimicrobial Peptides — Hirunipins — Kumar et al. (2025)
• Medicinal Leech Draft Genome — Anticoagulant Gene Survey — Kvist S, Manzano-Marín A, de Carle D, Trontelj P, Siddall ME (2020)
• Auswirkungen der Hirudotherapie auf Leberfunktionen, Lipidprofil und Insulinsensitivität bei Ratten mit metabolischem Syndrom — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Hirudotherapy in Medicine and Dentistry — Jha K et al. (2015)
• Medicinal leech therapy (hirudotherapy): a brief overview — Singh A (2010)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN PRESBYACUZIS PRAECOX IN CLEAN-UP WORKERS AFTER THE CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT DURING THE POST-CATASTROPHE YEARS — Zabolotnyi D, Mishchanchuk N (2019)
• Investigation of oxidant-antioxidant status in patients treated with hirudotherapy: an experimental study — Sarikan I, Savas H (2024)
• Leech therapeutic applications — Abdualkader A et al. (2013)
• Non-Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia Due to Hirudotherapy: A Case Report — Akalın Ç, Ekmen N (2020)
• Leech therapy: a history — Hyson J (2005)

Alle von der ASH analysierten Studien →