Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Bivalirudin plus a high-dose infusion versus heparin monotherapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomised trial

Randomized controlled trial published in Lancet (2022)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: 18. Juni 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Forschungsartikel – EvidenzreviewArtikelreferenz
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialArzneimittelentwicklungKlinische StudienLi Y et al. · Lancet, 2022

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous randomised trials of bivalirudin versus heparin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have reported conflicting results, in part because of treatment with different pharmacological regimens. We designed a large-scale trial examining bivalirudin with a post-PCI high-dose infusion compared with heparin alone, the regimens that previous studies have shown to have the best balance of safety and efficacy. METHODS: BRIGHT-4 was an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised controlled trial conducted at 87 clinical centres in 63 cities in China. Patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with radial artery access within 48 h of symptom onset who had not received previous fibrinolytic therapy, anticoagulants, or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive bivalirudin with a post-PCI high-dose infusion for 2-4 h or unfractionated heparin monotherapy. There was no masking. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use was reserved for procedural thrombotic complications in both groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3-5 bleeding at 30 days. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03822975), and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Feb 14, 2019, and April 7, 2022, a total of 6016 patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI were randomly assigned to receive either bivalirudin plus a high-dose infusion after PCI (n=3009) or unfractionated heparin monotherapy (n=3007). Radial artery access was used in 5593 (93·1%) of 6008 patients. Compared with heparin monotherapy, bivalirudin reduced the 30-day rate of the primary endpoint (132 events [4·39%] in the heparin group vs 92 events [3·06%] in the bivalirudin group; difference, 1·33%, 95% CI 0·38-2·29%; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·53-0·91; p=0·0070). All-cause mortality within 30 days occurred in 118 (3·92%) heparin-assigned patients and in 89 (2·96%) bivalirudin-assigned patients (HR 0·75; 95% CI 0·57-0·99; p=0·0420), and BARC types 3-5 bleeding occurred in 24 (0·80%) heparin-assigned patients and five (0·17%) bivalirudin-assigned patients (HR 0·21; 95% CI 0·08-0·54; p=0·0014). There were no significant differences in the 30-day rates of reinfarction, stroke, or ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation between the groups. Within 30 days, stent thrombosis occurred in 11 (0·37%) of bivalirudin-assigned patients and 33 (1·10%) of heparin-assigned patients (p=0·0015). INTERPRETATION: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI predominantly with radial artery access, anticoagulation with bivalirudin plus a post-PCI high-dose infusion for 2-4 h significantly reduced the 30-day composite rate of all-cause mortality or BARC types 3-5 major bleeding compared with heparin monotherapy. FUNDING: Chinese Society of Cardiology Foundation (CSCF2019A01), and a research grant from Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeRandomized Controlled TrialJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansHeparinPercutaneous Coronary InterventionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionMyocardial InfarctionDrug Therapy, CombinationPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexHemorrhageThrombosisHirudinsPeptide FragmentsRecombinant Proteins

Zusammenfassung

BRIGHT-4 randomized 6016 STEMI patients to bivalirudin plus post-PCI high-dose infusion vs heparin monotherapy; primary endpoint at 30 days reduced 3.06% vs 4.39% with bivalirudin (HR 0.69).

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

Die randomisierte BRIGHT-4-Studie verglich Bivalirudin plus post-PCI-Hochdosisinfusion gegenüber Heparin-Monotherapie bei 6.016 Patienten mit ST-Strecken-Hebungs-Myokardinfarkt, die sich einer primären perkutanen Koronarintervention überwiegend über radialen Zugang unterzogen. Bivalirudin reduzierte signifikant den 30-Tage-Komposit-Endpunkt aus Gesamtmortalität oder BARC-3–5-Blutung (3,06 % vs. 4,39 %; HR 0,69; P = 0,007), mit geringerer Gesamtmortalität (2,96 % vs. 3,92 %; HR 0,75; P = 0,042) und geringerer Stent-Thrombose (0,37 % vs. 1,10 %; P = 0,0015). Das Abstract enthält keine Erwähnung von Blutegeln, Hirudotherapie oder aus Blutegeln stammenden Verbindungen, und es kann keine vertretbare Verbindung zum Gebiet der ASH abgeleitet werden. Dies ist eine rein kardiologische Studie, die zwei Antikoagulationsregime vergleicht.

Zitation

Bivalirudin plus a high-dose infusion versus heparin monotherapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomised trial.

Li Y et al. · Lancet, 2022

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Freigabe für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.